1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Ffp

Discussion in 'Manchester United' started by Swarbs, Apr 8, 2011.

  1. Swarbs

    Swarbs Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,533
    Likes Received:
    1,371
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/9450671.stm

    "United made a pre-tax loss of £79m in 2010 but, by Uefa's measure, actually returned a positive break-even result of £42m."

    Good to know. That £42 million would cover amortised transfer spending of around £160 million, so at least we know the FFP rule won't affect us. Tho' City and the Chavs look like they might be fooked.

    Also, I know some people think UEFA will back down and not ban City and Chelsea. But had the rules been in place this season, if those two were banned Spurs and 'pool would take their place, so the prestige of the CL wouldn't suffer all that much. It'll be interesting to see how seriously City and Chelsea take the new regs over the next few years...
     
    #1
  2. HRH Custard VC

    HRH Custard VC National Car Park Attendant

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    28,168
    Likes Received:
    12,115
    Chavs and City will fudge it to get in.
     
    #2
  3. merrysupersteve

    merrysupersteve Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,317
    Likes Received:
    3
    I have a feeling that Man City will be okay and all fans at the Walt Disney City of Manchester Stadium will agree no doubt.
     
    #3
  4. Constcrepe

    Constcrepe Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    5,397
    Likes Received:
    19
    The rich clubs will be given a green light ironically due to money and revenue. Yes I'm that cynical. <grr>
     
    #4
  5. Aberdeenarsenal

    Aberdeenarsenal Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    1
    Alot of respect for United as they try and develop some talent instead of just bringing in the big names like the 2 blue sides.
     
    #5
  6. - SW6 -

    - SW6 - Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    8,349
    Likes Received:
    89
    Which talent specifically are you referring to?

    The Twins and Hernandez I would go for, can't really think of anyone else?
     
    #6

  7. Swarbs

    Swarbs Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,533
    Likes Received:
    1,371
    Nani, Ronaldo and Smalling perchance? And then of course there's Evra and Vidic who weren't particularly well known when we signed them, Anderson, Macheda, Welbeck, Diouf and Cleverley who we're still developing and Fletcher, O'Shea, Brown, Evans, Gibson, Giggs and Scholes in our current squad who we've developed pretty much from scratch <ok>

    Even talented youngsters who don't make it at United still tend to go on to top flight careers - Richardson, Campbell, Cathcart, Shawcross, Bardsley, Jones, Spector, Phil Neville, Pique and Rossi spring to mind. I think only West Ham compare to United in terms of the number of current top flight players they have developed.
     
    #7
  8. - SW6 -

    - SW6 - Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    8,349
    Likes Received:
    89
    Rubbish<laugh>

    <run>
     
    #8
  9. Swarbs

    Swarbs Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,533
    Likes Received:
    1,371
    You still haven't named the only two Chelsea academy players to have played more than 100 games for the Chelsea first team over the past two decades. Another 19 games and Jonny Evans will become the 10th player to do the same for United...
     
    #9
  10. - SW6 -

    - SW6 - Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    8,349
    Likes Received:
    89
    I never said I would<whistle>
     
    #10
  11. The Ginger Marks

    The Ginger Marks Ma Mo

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    40,564
    Likes Received:
    16,202
    ***WARNING***

    Kudos seeker present

    <laugh><laugh>
     
    #11

Share This Page