what evidence is that Huthy? If you referr to the website re the global warming thing, then yeah I took the response to ST from there (not the Martin luther king stuff) does everyone else on here just think up stuff, or do they get it from a source, no matter how ****ty? also just because its a website with specific leanings doesnt mean its ALL wrong does it? after all some young uns do have the potential to be stunners as grown ups, and its obvious early on
I'm thinking of becoming a Buddhist. Well I'm looking into it. Seems like fun but need to read a bit more first.
He's somewhere in between On the one hand he's far more literate and less abusive when faced with dissent but on the other he tends to focus on the actions of non-Muslim countries while downplaying actions of Muslim countries Now if he would just accept that the idea of the Jewish God choosing to have an anti-Semitic *****phile as a prophet makes no sense whatsoever
was wondering where you was Thats actually quite positive from you, based on history. I have tears in my eyes I would venture that I present the other side and peoples prejudices become obvious. The Iran/Israel thing was a classic example. As I would say I only marginally have time for Iran over Israel with regards to religion. However with regards to who is most dangerous based on evidence and history, Israel how this gets construed as supporting Ira i dont know As for the Jewish God, he wasnt called God an dremember mary was 12-14 when she gave birth to jesus
