https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/44209341 Anybody know anything about this? Not heard anything about the possibility before.
strange how that suddenly reared its head …. the regulatory body's actions sometimes are so bizzarre it makes me want to spit...…………...
If any of my players spat then they would be out of a job now. Despicable, and his missing in action for our first 6 matches leaves us carrying his burden and I don't want his type (spitters) at my club. Shocking behaviour.
where is it published on how where at/ to or other he spat … was it malicious or was it simply a reaction not directed ? every week you usually see one or more players spit , it is often a reflex on exertion.
If he spat at someone he deserved whatever he gets , disgusting , seems odd the club are considering an appeal though if it's clear cut, so I will reserve my judgement for now.,
There could be an argument for a cultural difference in attitude on his behalf but it's a dirty, disgusting, foul thing to do to another human being.
Totally agree. But I didn't see it, it seems as though no-one on here saw it, nothing apparently came out in the immediate aftermath of the match and the first time it came to light publicly was a couple of days age when he was banned!!! All seems a bit peculiar to me!!
IT IS WRONG FOR ANYONE TO OUTRIGHTLY CONDEMN ANYONE FOR ANYTHING THAT DOES NOT HAVE PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE / evidence ..... It does seem peculiar that after so many weeks it suddenly comes to light, Birmingham never mentioned it... no referee report ….. or action on the day!
Didn't we have another after the match suspension when action was taken way after the game was completed? Think it was at Fulham when the panel decided a City player got an opponent sent off by faking an injury?
No, that was Bailey Wright, who was banned for the very next game against Cardiff. But we didn't need him to beat them then
