Euro 2016 thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The bottom line is that England don't have good enough players. There were a few young players in the squad, who have emerged since the World Cup debacle, but England still play in the same disjointed, "lump it in and hope for the best" way. We continue to lack players with a good first touch, who are able to pass and move coherently and are clever enough to to find space and time or the bit of skill or class which gives the better teams the edge (for example Griezmann's timely intervention yesterday for France).

Some of our players look good a club level because they have star players around them who provide that coherence or creavity, which enables them to shine. When you put the England players together in the same team their lack of real ability is painfully obvious - as has been shown tournament after tournament. We revert to trying to wear down the opposition by lumping the ball into the box as often as possible, but teams are wise to this now - and all the teams are very organised. Wales and Iceland are proof that good organisation and playing to a plan can compensate for lack of ability to some extent. Unfortunately, England lack organisation too. The players don't play to a plan, nobody seems to know what their roles are (how do Kane, Vardy, Sturridge, Rooney and Alli all fit together?) and the personnel changes so often that there is no understanding.

A total shambles.

Can't disagree, Luke. The lack of basic skills in some of them is appalling.

As to line ups and permutations of, that's down to clueless Woy.
 
Maybe Hodgson should've picked more Arsenal players?
He could've had, erm... that, wait no, he's Welsh. Er...

Welbeck would of gone if he wasn't injured I think. Oxo and Walcott didn't have good seasons and there were othe oacey options available. Wilshere I thought did well today despite his lack of game time over the season. So I don't disagree about there not being Arsenal options to go for. The Spurs lot were **** though today.
 
I thought Rooney looked good in the first half but in the second half he went to absolute ****, literally everything he did was terrible, lost his touch, poor passing, poor decision making, slowed the game down. The pressure got to him as the experienced player and it showed. Terrible second half performance from him.

I thought Wilshere and Rashford are the only two players who can be happy with there contribution today, the rest of the team were just awful in every way possible.
That's partisan. Wilshere was awful, along with the rest of them. Rashford looked good but didn't have enough tme.
 
Welbeck would of gone if he wasn't injured I think. Oxo and Walcott didn't have good seasons and there were othe oacey options available. Wilshere I thought did well today despite his lack of game time over the season. So I don't disagree about there not being Arsenal options to go for. The Spurs lot were **** though today.
Everyone was ****. I don't think that's a coincidence.
Ramsey's been ****ing awful all tournament too, by the way. That's even if you ignore his haircut.
 
Welbeck would of gone if he wasn't injured I think. Oxo and Walcott didn't have good seasons and there were othe oacey options available. Wilshere I thought did well today despite his lack of game time over the season. So I don't disagree about there not being Arsenal options to go for. The Spurs lot were **** though today.


Brazil?.....
 
Can't disagree, Luke. The lack of basic skills in some of them is appalling.

As to line ups and permutations of, that's down to clueless Woy.

In the second half today the inability to do even the most basic things was absolutely embarrassing for all them. And how does Hodgson hit this far into a tournament and this long into his job and not know his best team or who plays well together?
 
So there you have the English playing without their European team mates.

Good luck for the future.
 
Everyone was ****. I don't think that's a coincidence.
Ramsey's been ****ing awful all tournament too, by the way. That's even if you ignore his haircut.

I think Ramsey's been fairly good, better than he has been in recent times for Wales, particularly there last game.

The whole England team have been **** though. Today was so bad. There aren't words to articulate the atrocious shambles of a performance today.
 
In the second half today the inability to do even the most basic things was absolutely embarrassing for all them. And how does Hodgson hit this far into a tournament and this long into his job and not know his best team or who plays well together?

As has been said, Kane, Sturridge, Vardy, and Rashford all on at the same time??

Pure desperation!..Please, get out there and save my job. The only possible upside is, they didn't!..
 
  • Like
Reactions: afcftw
Alli and Kane were poor though arguably we didn't play to either of their strengths. Dier was ok but poor against Iceland. Walker was excellent for the first 2 games but poor against Iceland. Rose was one of the few to come out of the tournament with any credit, though not much.

The bottom line is that England don't have good enough players. There were a few young players in the squad, who have emerged since the World Cup debacle, but England still play in the same disjointed, "lump it in and hope for the best" way. We continue to lack players with a good first touch, who are able to pass and move coherently and are clever enough to to find space and time or the bit of skill or class which gives the better teams the edge (for example Griezmann's timely intervention yesterday for France).

Some of our players look good a club level because they have star players around them who provide that coherence or creavity, which enables them to shine. When you put the England players together in the same team their lack of real ability is painfully obvious - as has been shown tournament after tournament. We revert to trying to wear down the opposition by lumping the ball into the box as often as possible, but teams are wise to this now - and all the teams are very organised. Wales and Iceland are proof that good organisation and playing to a plan can compensate for lack of ability to some extent. Unfortunately, England lack organisation too. The players don't play to a plan, nobody seems to know what their roles are (how do Kane, Vardy, Sturridge, Rooney and Alli all fit together?) and the personnel changes so often that there is no understanding.

A total shambles.

We have some good players and one or two very good ones but they can't out-play a poor setup and system and account for individual mistakes. Proper organisation and a coherent, well drilled way of playing makes up for a lack of absolute quality (see -> Iceland), and a lack of the former can totally undo the latter as England have adequately demonstrated over the last decade or so. We weren't bemoaning a lack of quality when we beat Germany, or when Alli scored that screamer against France.

The players need to take some blame especially those who made mistakes at key moments. But the management and coaching staff also need to hold up their hands and accept a considerable share of the blame for their totally inadequate selection policy at a squad and team level, and utter failure over nearly 6 years of management to introduce any coherent style of play and identity to the England team.
 
Thats because he's the only winger in the squad! Everyone else is a 10 or a striker!

Imagine needing an inspirational team talk and Roy is in the dressing room

That was my point. Sturridge didn't do an awful job on the other side but it was very obvious he was playing out of position. Much like Rooney. Much like Alli. Much like Lallana.

It can work but there's a time and a place for testing things out and it's not at a bloody Euros! Play players in positions you know you can rely on them to perform in. Don't take injured players. Don't make the same mistakes every bloody time!
 
That's partisan. Wilshere was awful, along with the rest of them. Rashford looked good but didn't have enough tme.

Disagree, I thought Wilshere was the only player to put any kind of decent delivery into the box and inject some form of movement and passing to the midfield, by that point everyone else looked bereft of ideas.

Rashford should have been on earlier, I was calling for Rashford on for Rooney on our euro thread early into the second half when it become clear Rooney was having some kind of mental breakdown in front of the nation.
 
Players need to take responsibility on the pitch and management need to take responsibility off it and be prepared to make harsh calls (see England rugby for an example of this turnaround - not the first time we'll hear that comparison over the coming weeks I bet).

Eddie Jones would have had no issues whatsoever dropping Rooney and going for the starting XI that
played the friendly against Germany.
 
Not good enough to progress to the latter stages of a tournament.

And certainly not good enough to beat Iceland tonight.
And that's nothing to do with the players available, in my opinion.

Hodgson did a woeful job at the tournament, again.
Picked the wrong players, didn't balance the squad and failed to work out what his best side was.
Loads of unfit, knackered or confidence-hit players, all sandwiched into something vaguely resembling a side.
He left out players on form, on a high and playing consistently well, going for favourites and overloading his forward options.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurf and afcftw