1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Dodgy ref's

Discussion in 'Manchester United' started by Constcrepe, Mar 21, 2011.

  1. Constcrepe

    Constcrepe Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    5,397
    Likes Received:
    19
    Dodgy decisions. How many times have we heard the ABU brigade this season cry if it wasn't for dodgy refereeing decisions, Utd wouldn't be top. Did anyone else not see Bendtner's handball for the Arsenal equaliser against WBA? Is it me or did he not use his hand (not unlike that other cheater Henry) to keep the ball in play?

    Any thoughts?
     
    #1
  2. Jip Jaap Stam

    Jip Jaap Stam General Chat Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    Messages:
    15,541
    Likes Received:
    2,320
    I think most of the bigger clubs tend to get the 50/50 decisions - especially at home - but out of the top 4 teams, I think we suffer most. Especially against Chelsea!
     
    #2
  3. Constcrepe

    Constcrepe Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    5,397
    Likes Received:
    19
    To me it was such an obvious handball but none of the WBA players appealed? Is it me or has the world gone mad?
     
    #3
  4. Swarbs

    Swarbs Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,533
    Likes Received:
    1,371
    Didn't see the game, but I've seen at least three or four Gooners admit it was handball.

    My view on refs is the same as always. Refs make mistakes. They can't see everything and even if they could (with technology) they would still have to make subjective judgements and would still get stick. But overall there is no bias towards or against one team. There's a proven bias towards the home team, which has been shown to be proportional to the size of the crowd. This probably explains why we get decisions at OT, Chelsea get them at SB, Liverpool get them at Anfield etc, but overall it evens out.
     
    #4
  5. Constcrepe

    Constcrepe Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    5,397
    Likes Received:
    19
    I agree Swarbs the refs are only human and will of course make mistakes. There is no massive conspiracy involving referees but try and tell that to the ABU brigade. While technology cannot stop the refs making cock ups it can remedy some problems but my god isn't an overhaul of referees needed and soon.
     
    #5
  6. Jip Jaap Stam

    Jip Jaap Stam General Chat Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    Messages:
    15,541
    Likes Received:
    2,320
    According to Irvine Welsh, the Masons are to blame for the supposed pro-Rangers bias north of the border <laugh>

    By the way, quality signature. It's spreading!
     
    #6
  7. Jip Jaap Stam

    Jip Jaap Stam General Chat Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    Messages:
    15,541
    Likes Received:
    2,320
    I don't think refs are biased, just not very accurate, inconsistent and a bit weak when faced with angry players and a noisy crowd.
    KPR's well into his conspiracy theories, isn't he? <laugh>
     
    #7
  8. Swarbs

    Swarbs Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,533
    Likes Received:
    1,371
    Have you tried telling anything to the ABU's recently? My favourite was KPR's "Utd pay off all the refs, but don't mention our dodgy penalty against Sunderland cos that was the linesman not the ref" <laugh>

    I'm honestly not sure what can be done to fix the reffing issue. As long as managers are allowed to blame their own team's shortcomings on the ref, and criticise the ref even when they make the right decision, we're gonna struggle to convince top athletes to become refs. And I think it's almost impossible to name a top ref that doesn't make a few errors in a season, which indicates to me that it's impossible to cut the errors out altogether.
     
    #8
  9. Constcrepe

    Constcrepe Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    5,397
    Likes Received:
    19
    I don't see him as a wum only a sad tool who actually believes the tripe he posts.<laugh> I loved the post he made a while back claiming that Utd introduced cheating into football. He has been asked at least 4 times for proof of this but has failed to deliver each time. I was actually a little impressed with him at first expecting him to start talking about the 1915 British football betting scandal involving Man Utd and Liverpool. Then I remembered Liverpool has 4 players themselves banned from football because of the scandal so he obviously wouldn't bring this up.

    What a prat.
     
    #9
  10. Bloody Wanker

    Bloody Wanker Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,614
    Likes Received:
    1
    I doubt he actually knows about it.
     
    #10

  11. Jip Jaap Stam

    Jip Jaap Stam General Chat Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    Messages:
    15,541
    Likes Received:
    2,320
    I doubt he can use the toilet unaided.
     
    #11

Share This Page