Danny Seabourne

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Jan 30, 2012
628
8
18
Prior to the incident at the start of the season, Seabourne was starting to establish himself as our first choice partner for Fonte. He played excellently in the games he played prior to getting his life threatening injuries and was beginning to look like an excellent prospect. Despite this i see many Saints fans criticizing him and saying he was a 'pointless signing. Was just wondering who sees him as first choice cover for Hoover and Fonte, or who thinks he was in fact, a waste of money. In my opinion he is first choice back up behind Fonte and Hoover and will slot onto the bench after a few games for the development squad, due to the fact he can also be deployed at left back.