DALEK King on Clyde tonight wanted to change the criteria for entry to competitions in football, from merit and following the rule book to attendance. A caller asked DALEK to admit that the SFA had not followed its own rule book by giving SEVCO a licence to play in the SFL thus destroying the victim culture held by sevconians presently. DALEK decided to side step the issue claiming that given sevcos larger attendances they were better for the Scottish game than Spartans etc. Ok DALEK let's apply your criteria to the CL and not be selective in order to favour your own club. Celtic have for 14 years consistently had larger attendances than rfc, by about 7,000 annually. This means that Celtic would by Daleks definition bring more to the CL than rfc with their smaller attendance. Also Newcastle United have a larger average attendance than rfc as do many German clubs, east European clubs Greek clubs and so on, to the point that rfc may never play in European football again. RTC SIC classification for companies gives a holding company 70100 classification and a sporting organisation classification 93120. RFC 2012 are classified as 93120 meaning that it was the football club which was liquidated and not a holding company. THE DEFINITIVE WORD ON SEVCO THE NEWEST CLUB IN SCOTTISH FOOTBALL. ALL CLUB V COMPANY AND KIT KAT AND RUSSIAN DOLL ARGUMENTS END HERE.......SIC CLASSIFICATION.
Darrell King is a cabbage. Honestly, they could pick anyone out of the crowd at Ibrox and they would do a better impression of a neutral than him.
Did he... did he actually say those teams (such as Rangers i.e bigger than Spartans) with big attendances should qualify for the Champions League? Or is this your interpretation? Now, King is a fanny but ... If he said Rangers in Div 3 was better for Scottish football (Div 3/SFL) due to attendances much bigger than spartans i.e sel outs at home and large away supports, then is he not right?
