Crime - part deux.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should crime happen

  • Go on then why not.

  • Yes

  • Stfu sucky

  • Tobes and peej welch couple

  • Suck Roy's tits

Results are only viewable after voting.
brb said:
I don't particularly like the guy, but I also think should stuff like this really be getting dragged through our crown courts, especially in the current climate of a massive backlog of cases awaiting trial. Instead of getting rid of Juries maybe they should be kicking this nonsense out of the court room. The judge had made it clear in his summing up that there were private cases against him, one for which had already cost him a £100k. If this was two nobodies arguing on twitter no one would give a ****, the police certainly wouldn't be rocking up to protect us, but some how tv celebrities become protected by the law. It's not nice what he did and it needed to stop, but he was clearly testing the limit of free speech with his insults, but it's clear in this country free speech no longer exists, and you've got less chance of being locked up if you are a nonce. Yet now all he has to do is name drop the forbidded on X and he activates his prison sentence, the world has gone mad. I'm sure there are lots of women in society that would love similar protection, that they don't get btw.
Click to expand...

Maybe this is the sort of crime that should be dealt with without a Jury as long as the judge was not a follower or hater, please tick one of these boxes judge
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
duggie2000 said:
Maybe this is the sort of crime that should be dealt with without a Jury as long as the judge was not a follower or hater, please tick one of these boxes judge
Click to expand...

I never even thought his behaviour would get as far has the court room - I always imagined a few guys paying him a visit one dark night, to give him well-being check...

You must log in or register to see images
 
Cant i know though about joey b case but this part jumped out

But when posts deliberately target individuals with vilifying comparisons to serial killers or false insinuations of *****philia, designed to humiliate and distress, they forfeit their protection.

I want people getting stopped for accusing people of being *****s as there are serious consequences for named persons if it was a real and non joking thing let alone coming from someone with as much influence and pull as joey b.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
BobbyD said:
Cant i know though about joey b case but this part jumped out

But when posts deliberately target individuals with vilifying comparisons to serial killers or false insinuations of *****philia, designed to humiliate and distress, they forfeit their protection.

I want people getting stopped for accusing people of being *****s as there are serious consequences for named persons if it was a real and non joking thing let alone coming from someone with as much influence and pull as joey b.
Click to expand...
“Bike nonce” is hilarious and the fact it was aimed at Jeremy Vine should be more than enough to stop it being considered a crime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD and duggie2000
Sucky would be fuming about the horrendous case of two Afghan migrants, both conveniently 17 while looking about 28, raping a 15-year-old in a park in Leamington. One was, conveniently, a week too young for automatic deportation for any sentence above one year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
Listened to the details of that retrial of Robert Rhodes, after he was acquitted 8 years ago of murdering his wife. Case of double jeopardy, but there was substantial evidence that came forward that wasn't previously available.

His young kids aged around 9/10 years old at the time I think, came forward and said their dad had killed her, and that they were manipulated to to play along with the original version of events.

So a case of a rare retrial.

Good on them kids, well adults now probably.
 
brb said:
Listened to the details of that retrial of Robert Rhodes, after he was acquitted 8 years ago of murdering his wife. Case of double jeopardy, but there was substantial evidence that came forward that wasn't previously available.

His young kids aged around 9/10 years old at the time I think, came forward and said their dad had killed her, and that they were manipulated to to play along with the original version of events.

So a case of a rare retrial.

Good on them kids, well adults now probably.
Click to expand...
Poor buggers, losing their mom like that and then having to live with that since
 
  • Like
Reactions: duggie2000 and brb
brb said:
Listened to the details of that retrial of Robert Rhodes, after he was acquitted 8 years ago of murdering his wife. Case of double jeopardy, but there was substantial evidence that came forward that wasn't previously available.

His young kids aged around 9/10 years old at the time I think, came forward and said their dad had killed her, and that they were manipulated to to play along with the original version of events.

So a case of a rare retrial.

Good on them kids, well adults now probably.
Click to expand...
Having a read about it, seems it was one child who is referred to as a their
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back