You’re a smart man, Uber.
You know it.
You’re a smart man, Uber.
I think that you think that he thinks youre disagreeing, thats what i thinkI think you think we’re disagreeing on this point, matey-peeps.
I think that you think that he thinks youre disagreeing, thats what i think
I think you think we’re disagreeing on this point, matey-peeps.
Youre not thinking straightI think your thinking that I think that he thinks I’m disagreeing is an interesting thought that needs thinking about, I think.
Where we disagree is in making it a party-political issue.
Youre not thinking straight
Feel free to point out precisely where I said that, Mr Strollopopolous.
All I said was that I assumed Mr R. Boy would support Starmer’s position on lockdowns on the basis that he’s a Labour supporter and hasn’t tweeted any opposition to restrictions in the past; he’s overtly supported his staff during such periods. Rather fascinatingly, I based my assumption on the evidence of Nevo’s tweets. Somewhat daft of me, right?
He's overtly supported his staff! Whatever next, footballers feeding hungry kids?
You've made a lot of assumptions, Ubes, and seem to have come to the conclusion that, as Neville is a Labour supporter (I have no idea if he actually is or not - I don't read his tweets), he has no right to suggest that Johnson has lost all credibility, something that the whole country can see. Col's post intimated the same.
He's overtly supported his staff! Whatever next, footballers feeding hungry kids?
You've made a lot of assumptions, Ubes, and seem to have come to the conclusion that, as Neville is a Labour supporter (I have no idea if he actually is or not - I don't read his tweets), he has no right to suggest that Johnson has lost all credibility, something that the whole country can see. Col's post intimated the same.
I posted his original tweet without comment because I agreed with him.
I was clear that I was making assumptions. You, of course, are at liberty to disagree with them.
Anything else, or can we move on?
I posted his original tweet without comment because I agreed with him.
I was clear that I was making assumptions. You, of course, are at liberty to disagree with them.
Anything else, or can we move on?
He's overtly supported his staff! Whatever next, footballers feeding hungry kids?
You've made a lot of assumptions, Ubes, and seem to have come to the conclusion that, as Neville is a Labour supporter (I have no idea if he actually is or not - I don't read his tweets), he has no right to suggest that Johnson has lost all credibility, something that the whole country can see. Col's post intimated the same.
I posted his original tweet without comment because I agreed with him.
I was clear that I was making assumptions. You, of course, are at liberty to disagree with them.
Anything else, or can we move on?
Johnson's doing his best though, eh?I agreed with him too.
I was simply (somewhat mischievously) pointing out that he's hardly likely to ever praise the Tories.
He was right on this....a little like a stopped clock is right twice a day.
I posted his original tweet without comment because I agreed with him.
I was clear that I was making assumptions. You, of course, are at liberty to disagree with them.
Anything else, or can we move on?

Johnson's doing his best though, eh?
Well he resisted locking down again and according to the news new data suggest it doesn’t seem that bad as some predicted… leaves Captain Hindsight in a difficult position as he wanted a 20 year lockdown.Johnson's doing his best though, eh?
That is a bit what it's like dealing with you, Col. You post some bollocks and I can declare it to be so safe in the knowledge that you won't respond. Quite good fun.Strolls could have a disagreement in an empty room.![]()