Went to see this in 3d on friday. Its pretty good but the 3d was ****e, at the best bits it was like cardboard cut outs set further back in to the screen and at the worst it looked better without the glasses on. if you do go and see this see the 2d version.
The glasses are the reason i dont think 3d will become that big. Its a noveltty at the minute and people will think its good to try once - but your watching a film at home - everyone in the house needs the glasses- are you going to be ****ed buying lots of pairs in case you have mates around??? If one person doesnt have glasses they wont watch as it will be split screen etc Are you going to be ****ed wearing the glasses when you have the telly on whilst doing sumert else? No, its a waste of time therefore.At least with HD you can have it on in the background while on the computer etc
there is no future in 3d unless they can make a way for it to work without the glasses. I wont agree that its properly 3d until you can view it from all angles.
i saw avater in 2d cos 3d was sold out. The clash of the titans 3d was gash but the 3d trailers looked quite good. The one for that 3d dance gayfest looked good in 3d.
This is how I imagne 3D will be like in your home in the near future please log in to view this image
Clash of the Titans wisnae made for 3D, it was an after thought, they saw the success of 3D and thought they could make a **** load more money so re-mastered it to suit 3D which apparently made it pants. I suggest watch the 2d version. and avatar 3D was ****ing awesome, best film since Star Wars!!!!
I've not been to the cinema since Transformers or Borat, whichever was first. It's a ****ing rip-off and full of annoying ****e-bag teenagers.
