The Telegraph sees Sunlan's beating of Newcastle as a flash-in-the-pan: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...18/Hull-City-1-Sunderland-0-match-report.html The Guardian refers to SB's 'revenge', but not too heavily: http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/nov/02/hull-city-sunderland-premier-league The Yorkshire Post reflects on our inability to take advantage of two red cards; but also appreciates 3 points gained: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/spor...0-tigers-triumph-on-bruce-s-big-day-1-6210463 The Mirror takes a 'revenge is sweet' line, with Brucey being fired up by the boo-boys: http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/match-reports/hull-city-1-0-sunderland-nine-man-2655972 The Independent suggests Gus Poyet might be wondering just what he's taken on: http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...t-revival-crashes-after-one-game-8918834.html Sunderland's derby-day celebrations are over for the Mail: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...ttermole-Dossena-red-cards-Tigers-points.html For the Express: Brucey gets his revenge; but Sunderland implode: http://www.express.co.uk/sport/foot...-gifts-Steve-Bruce-revenge-against-Sunderland For the Star, Sunderland's indiscipline was the big factor: http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/fo...Two-red-cards-and-an-own-goal-sink-Black-Cats
I love that 1 line summary Stan, cheers for that! I dont get why people fail to see that with 9 men, they were defending with 7. Going down to 9 doesn't mean you can just skip through them and bang the goals in. It woulda been easier to score when they had 11 and were more spread out. Not to mention 2 of our players were probably suffering post traumatic stress after those awful red cards. We also go to give a couple of our returning injureds a light run out too. 3 points = most important thing Oh the Independent echoes my comments yesterday.
