I bought a Guardian today, to read while I was waiting at the hospital. Coverage of last night's games would be interesting, I thought. Chelsea dumped/Mourinho Arsenal dumped Norwich beaten on pens by Toffees. (local interest?) City - Leicester? **** all
Yep its like we dont exist. On a weekend the Guardian has more on foreign leagues than the Championship.
Get over it. The public gets what the public wants. News sells. We ain't news in that context. It's nothing to get in a flap about?
Did you read this story in the Grauniad Stan? Moving and weird. http://www.theguardian.com/artandde...ncol-jon-ronson-miniature-town-horrors-of-war
Typical of the broad sheets at least the Daily Mail their reports on their website are good and are always accompanied by a lot of good pictures.
Ye they read it on line instead, just like the Daily Mail. You then get a more balanced view of the world.
The public wants what the public gets, But I don't get what this society wants. So I'm going underground.
The Mail sells a lot of papers though. I read both as they are the best two online papers' sites which are still free. Reading the Grauniad one their reporters seem out of step with even their readers going by the comments sections.
You can tell that by sitting on a bus/in a waiting room. When you flap the paper to turn over, it nearly creates a tsunami. (Maybe tabloids aren't so anti-social). Mind you, you can't make conversations, cos all the others are looking through the portal of their 'devices' (i.e. mobile phones).
"Steve Bruce flaunts slimline body in revealing tracksuit." "All grown up: Andy Robertson poses for photographers with his arm up while the opposition score a goal."