Celtic vs Rangers (who is less lame?)

It has come to my attention that a lot of the people on GC are either Rangers or Celtic fans. I was trying to decide who I like least and who I would side with if there was a war. I mean, both of the clubs are pretty horrendous as they are in Scotland, the worlds most tragic country. Everyone is ugly and grumpy, its cold, rainy and it smells. Both tried to steal Grant Holt at some point but he turned them down (lol gutted lads)

Hers what I come up with:

Rangers (pros)

They are more English
Their remaining fans are loyal as they are in a low division (all their glory hunters, cough stereotypist cough, now support celtic)
Gazza played for them.

Rangers (cons)

They moan about being relegated when they deserved it
Ally mcoist wasnt funny on q of sport
boring football
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Celtic (pros)

They have green in their kit like Norwich
Henrik Larrson is quite cool

Celtic (cons)

They play boring football
They cheat a lot
They are less English
Their manager is a dullard
Glory hunting fans
a little bit tragic, in a two horse leage they have won loads less titles.
Fans are more angry
I see Rangers fans as nicer, upper class people (like me) Celtic are the opposite, dont have as much in common.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So after all due consideration I would choose Rangers to side with. Go awy Celtic fans you are banned

 

please log in to view this image

op

 

Who is Grant Holt?