How does that sit with the supposed agenda? Seeing as we've had 4(four) goals wrongly ruled out for offside so far this season there will have to be some turn around if refereeing decisions are going to cost celtc 10 points this season.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/scotland/15424810.stm Ki was miles onside. The Aberdeen No. 3 was playing him on. What the **** are you talking about? The free kick was clear obstruction. Away tae ****.
Hooper was offside before setting up Ki for the first goal. The free kick for the 2nd was as soft as it gets. Reminded me of the days of Petrov & Larsson winning plenty of soft free kicks in dangerous areas. Shocking defending by Dolly mind you.
That isn’t the question ST, the question is how this fits with the agenda. I would suggest that a Hun inventing favourable decisions for Celtic sits fairly well with the agenda
EDGE posting old conspiracy videos from Youtube and Frank claiming Rangers are hard done by. Maybe the worry about going bust is manifesting itself in weird and unusual ways?
Offside rules state that if any part of an attacking player's body that can score is closer to the goal line than less than 2 players (including the goalkeeper) then that player is offside. This is actually the reason Fortune, Bangura and Murphy have never been flagged offside in their career. I'm not claiming we're hard done by. We've got on with this season pretty well inspite of poor decisions going against us. It happens, so we dig in and move on Take a leaf Lenny.
Okay, let's go along with you and say he was offside for 3/8ths of a second. What's your point? Aberdeen's tactics were to kick anyone in a green and white shirt on Saturday and until the sending off the referee was very lenient with them (similar to the match against Dundee Utd). I lost count of the number of players who came through the back of Celtic players, especially Kayal who was obviously a target for Broon's "tactics". We got on with it and won the game.
We all know Webel, Supersizedhoop and ClitoralHood all go on about how Celtic have been hard done by from Masonic shape-shifting Lizard type refs who always go against celtic, yet it's clear from the evidence posted today that this isn't the case. Incase you missed it Webel, have a wee look. [video=youtube;rhXkgpCzM1o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rhXkgpCzM1o[/video]
My point is all the bleating and crying about referees is utter bullshit. They make mistakes and often make a complete cunt of matches, Craig Thomson being a prime example. However there's no agenda, they're just bad referees. Hearts players were doing the same to us yesterday, how Ian Black never got booked until the 80th minute I'll never know. The diddy teams see booting us as a leveller, it has always been the case. Referees seem to give them more leniency as well. celtc supporters really need to give it up with this conspiracy theory, it doesn't help anyone. I bet any football club in the world could list 10 different refereeing decisions that went against them throughout a season. The only ones we seem to hear about are when celtc are upset.
Superhoops is one of your lot at the wind up and Harry only ever talks to superhoop so is probably another hun, so basicly your retaliating to your own wums.
Tam, there are large elements of your support with the lunatic mindset of superhoops. It's sad, tragic, but true, although a wee bit funny as well. Not in a "haha" way but in a "look at the state of that cunt" way.
Funny you didn't mention the foul on the st mirren player in the build up to your goal last week , or the two soft penalties that won you the game at Inverness
