Well he is back and training, he wants to be back for the Utd game, glad to see him making progress http://www.swanseacity.net/page/Latest/0,,10354~2493828,00.html
bleedin marvellous..... question is, why did he feel the need to leave us whilst injured anyways! [video=youtube;zJ6VT7ciR1o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJ6VT7ciR1o[/video]
Medical facilities better at spurs maybe??? if they are im glad he went back...means we get him back playing quicker
Are really you trying to say that he would not have had such good treatment in our own Singleton's mixed ward with the marvellous slashers oops.... surgeons at his disposal..... surely not! Thank f he went away as he would be injured for another 15 weeks if he stayed down here! I take it you missed the point I was making about the bigger picture .... that our poor ' NATIONAL' health service is **** then ...... a bit of politics there for you! Ben Elton eat your heart out. sorry if it was vague but i agree
All players on loan goes back to the parent club when injured like caulker was, its not about who has the best medical facilities close by, its about the terms of the contract, spurs are protecting their investment in Caulker, and considering he has had the same injury previously its understandable that they want him going back to probably the same surgeons and doctors who treated him previously.