Is it just me or does anyone else find it iffy that they can sell a player then a couple of days later get their match postponed due to lack of players?
Burnley
- Thread starter E.T. Fairfax
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
They're all playing the game with injuries and covid mind you.
Tbh, didn't the Mags pay a release clause in his contract? They had no say over whether he moved or not as the clause automatically gives the bidding club the opportunity to discuss terms with the player.
I think its likely they're looking to 'delay' playing games until they get a replacement in.
Tbh, didn't the Mags pay a release clause in his contract? They had no say over whether he moved or not as the clause automatically gives the bidding club the opportunity to discuss terms with the player.
I think its likely they're looking to 'delay' playing games until they get a replacement in.
Still, it poses the question. Should teams be allowed to get rid of players whilst they could potentially struggle to be able to field a team?