I've got the three dots disease dave. Can you post it again? (I hope it isn't the photo of Collins' header ........)
There is a site problem where sometimes when a picture is posted it shows up as 3 dots for some but not all and as yet no solution has been found!
When someone posts an image, some of us find it doesn't show in our browsers, only three dots, as so: . . . There is some info about it on the technical help thread.
Now I know the probable reaction I will get for this but I would rather have Fraser Forster if I had to make a choice. Ruddy has improved and is a decent keeper but I do not feel he his that quality keeper he is made out to be. In fact I think he has been a tad shaky recently I.e. Bellamy's goal an fat West Ham. I'll take cover now!
I wouldn't worry fella, I think deep down most people would probably agree with you (I know I certainly do) Don't get me wrong, I love JR and still think he's a cracking keeper, I just think Forster is better
If it is the image has been reversed, because Barkley's shot went in at JR's left post didn't it? Re. Forster, it's academic because he wasn't a possibility for us at the time. Personally I don't think there is much between them. Celtic fans (and commentators) have been plenty critical of some aspects of Forster's game. JR's injury (which people don't always seem to appreciate the seriousness of) has knocked his progress right back.
Completely agree. I think he's a really good presence too. In my head there is this myth that he was brilliant under Lambert, but then equally I'm pretty sure he made a number of errors then, we were just used to scoring to make up for it! Now his errors are more punishing...
