1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Billy...

Discussion in 'Leeds United' started by LondonWhite88, Mar 14, 2012.

  1. LondonWhite88

    LondonWhite88 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2011
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    1
    Afternoon all!

    So, Paynter's banging them in for the reserve side and has apparently turned down a loan move to fight for his place.
    Judging by the last couple of matches, a target man up top with McCormack (or Webber/Snods) behind is Colin's tactic for the rest of the season.
    Out of the striker's available, Forssell to me really doesn't look good enough - still a couple of signs of a top player, but no goal threat at all so far. Webber doesn't look like he's been signed as an out and out striker, more like playing in the attacking three. And Somma's injured still.

    Becchio had his first truly effective match in a long while at the weekend and is pretty much everyone's favourite to lead the line. But we do need an effective alternative to him also.
    Now I have been unlucky enough to catch a couple of Paynter's appearances first hand and he has been the worst thing since Liam Dickinson. However he does have a decent history, is playing well and apparently determined.

    The question is - would you want Paytner on the bench as a different option to Luc?

    Personally, I'd give him a go. Forssell is never going to be a reliable option, so why not let a goal-hungry Billy have a shot. If he comes on and looks like a self-concious, headless rhino again, then we need to get shot.

    Thoughts?

    MOT to the play-offs!
     
    #1
  2. Old Peacock

    Old Peacock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Messages:
    1,160
    Likes Received:
    42
    Paynter's not a target man, Becchio will keep his place & we don't have a back up.
     
    #2
  3. Farsleyexile

    Farsleyexile Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    4,117
    Likes Received:
    1,211
    Paynter is a good reserve dammit :)
     
    #3
  4. ristac

    ristac Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    27,953
    Likes Received:
    32,255
    I think McCormack and Becchio have done quite well recently, we don't need Paynter, I would have rather kept Sam than Billy
     
    #4
  5. Whiteyorkist

    Whiteyorkist Active Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,493
    Likes Received:
    14
    If I had to rely on Paynter to get us a goal or Forssell I'd pick Forssell every time.
     
    #5
  6. Josh-LUFC

    Josh-LUFC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    9,285
    Likes Received:
    1,180
    Paynter is a target man, not a very good one but he is

    Agreed <ok>
     
    #6
  7. ristac

    ristac Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    27,953
    Likes Received:
    32,255
    Target man does not count around the middle, it isn't who can hit the fat boy...
     
    #7
  8. Josh-LUFC

    Josh-LUFC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    9,285
    Likes Received:
    1,180
    What are ya talking about. The name Target perfectly describes hitting fatboy Paynter
     
    #8

Share This Page