1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Biased reporting on BBC Sport website

Discussion in 'Norwich City' started by JM Fan, May 5, 2012.

  1. JM Fan

    JM Fan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    14,383
    Likes Received:
    4,633
    Just read the report on today's game and it says that Arsenal should have had a penalty - no mention of the 2 claims that Norwich had!! Where do they get these reporters????


    Loved the WUM on Canary Call, saying, "Ruddy is Ruddy awful!!!" What a muppett!!!
     
    #1
  2. Beefforhire-NCFC

    Beefforhire-NCFC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    5,287
    Likes Received:
    29
    they're all cockney nobheads at the BBC
     
    #2
  3. YellowLittle

    YellowLittle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    2,044
    Likes Received:
    78
    BBC are just a bunch of dinosaurs. Sky actually give airtime to both teams when they have live coverage, although they do focus on top 6 they normally have fair pundits on who actually know what there talking about.

    The amount of errors I have seen on BBC reports is astonishing, pretty ridiculous and completely unprofessional. They wouldn't dare get Rooney mixed up with someone or mistype his name.

    On the punditry it's amazing how Lawrenson avoids naming Norwich players, probably because he can't.

    Lee Dixon is good though.
     
    #3
  4. tipsycanary

    tipsycanary Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,852
    Likes Received:
    30
    In fairness they briefly mention it later on, but it reads in favour of Arsenal. I appreciated Lawro's write up for the predictions. Out of 7 paragraphs (albeit brief ones) 4 were on Arsenal, 2 Stoke and 1 Norwich. Still its always the way
     
    #4
  5. redruthyella

    redruthyella Active Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    4,459
    Likes Received:
    7
    Doesn't matter one iota what they think. We all saw two stitched on penalties not given. How the one on Martin wasn't given when the ref stared straight at it was almost tantamount to cheating.
     
    #5
  6. JM Fan

    JM Fan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    14,383
    Likes Received:
    4,633
    You mean like when GH got penalised for exactly the same offence against Swansea at the Liberty???? We seem to have had very few penalties given and after the first 3 or 4 games, haven't conceded many either.
     
    #6
  7. ncfcwonky

    ncfcwonky New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    3,465
    Likes Received:
    18
    I heard that Arsenal maybe should have had a penalty today. Maybe it didn't quite even itself out today but a lot of it is down to the bias of fans.
     
    #7
  8. Dangerous Marsupial

    Dangerous Marsupial Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,386
    Likes Received:
    54
    A penalty? They should have had two probably. From that point of view the decisions were even, but if Ramsey had been sent off when he should have, the game would have panned out differently - we would have won and Arsenal wouldn't have had those penalty shouts - and if ours had been given we may have been 4 - 1 up!
     
    #8
  9. VectisCanary

    VectisCanary Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2012
    Messages:
    919
    Likes Received:
    5
    Even the Arsenal fans were saying on their match thread they were fortunate that we hadn't been awarded 2 penalties and that they hadn't had someone sent off.
     
    #9
  10. ThaiCanary

    ThaiCanary Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    16,441
    Likes Received:
    2,090
    Possibly - I would never go as far as to say we would have won, although the chances may have been higher had Ramsey been dismissed <ok>
     
    #10

Share This Page