I think the main problem is that Gary Neville has come along and shown that pundits can actually add real insight. People kind of put up with the status quo prior to that.
I completly agree. Neville has a fresh enthusiasm and he makes you sit up and take note. I think this is good, because I like watching football (obviously) and he makes the analysis worth listening to oppose to the old guard at the BBC where you kind of sleep walk through it; and maybe get excited at the odd comment like Lawreson saying we are like the red arrows! I do however like a bit of the old sarcasm, and the dryness on offer from time to time i.e. Lawrenson and co. However, probably just down to the fact that (like match of the day itself) its become a comfy pair of slippers!


