The ExChristian.Net blog exists for the express purpose of encouraging those who have decided to leave religion behind. It is not an open challenge for Christians to avenge what they perceive as an offense against their religious beliefs. ▼ 9/28/10 The Protestant Clergy Sex Abuse Pattern By Valerie Tarico ~* One of the most striking aspects of the Protestant clergy sex abuse pattern is that most people don’t realize it is a pattern. The Catholic Church has taken a well deserved beating in the courts and in the court of public opinion as former altar boys, orphans and ordinary parishioners have come forward with appalling stories of sex abuse. Yet equally egregious violations by Protestant clergy have failed to generate the same level of outrage. Why? You might guess that the problems in the Catholic Church are uniquely wide spread, but that would be the wrong answer. Last week’s Eddie Long scandal, in which one of the nation’s most politically connected and homophobic mega-ministers was accused of strong-arming gay sex out of teens, was just one tip of an enormous Protestant iceberg. The news monthly Freethought Today has a regular feature called “Black Collar Crime Blotter”--typically a two page sampler of fraud, theft, and sexual abuse taken from the media across the country. They just turned their archive over to the Kinsey Institute. A website called ClergyGoneWild provides links to recent crime stories, including child abuse (206 articles) and internet solicitation (18). This problem is nothing new. The first book on clergy sex abuse in this country, Betrayal of Trust, was published in 1988. The perception that Catholic priests are overrepresented among offenders is correct. They do offend at a higher rate. But because this country is predominantly Protestant, more children are abused by Protestant ministers than by Catholic priests. In 1990, the Freedom From Religion Foundation issued a study on ****philia by clergy. At that time, two clergy per week were being arrested in North America for sex crimes against children. Fifty eight percent of them were Protestant. The reality is that power is arousing for many male humans.Why do we largely overlook the horrific pattern of Protestant ****philia and sexual exploitation? Here are a few factors to consider: The Catholic Church is easier to think of as a monolithic entity. That means it is easier for the press to cohere the abuse incidents into a single story and our brains to grock it. The idea of one big conspiracy appeals to us: “The Church” did it and then covered it up. The centralized hierarchy of Catholicism makes Catholic offenders easier to sue and guarantees deep pockets. The lawsuits in turn both generate their own news cycle and bring victims out of the closet. Since most Americans are Protestants, the Catholic Sex Abuse scandal is a story about “them.” Protestant ****philia is a story about “us,” which makes it less gratifying and more uncomfortable. Most Americans find the idea of celibacy peculiar at best. It makes for a more interesting narrative than a generic story about abuse of authority. Has the priestly pledge of celibacy contributed to a pattern of inappropriate and exploitative sex by Catholics? Probably. But a look at the behavior of politicians and Protestant ministers—even just those iceberg tips that actually emerge into daylight--should tell us that celibacy is a small part of the story. The reality is that power is arousing for many male humans (and that male power and status are arousing for many females). The pattern is plain as day in Hollywood dramas, rape statistics, D.C. dramas, sexual fantasies, and clergy sex abuse. (Where is the university research on the topic?) And yet we continue to delude ourselves that Protestant ministers are somehow exempt from the endemic, that the incidents are isolated. We say that “absolute power corrupts absolutely,” and yet we give ministers a level of deference that is unparalleled—and expect our vulnerable children to do the same. When Annie Laurie Gaylor wrote Betrayal of Trust twenty two years ago, the pattern in Catholic congregations was to huddle the wagons around accused clergy. She quotes one defense witness who described the abuse as “one drop of ink in crystal clear water.” Today, after years of repeated exposure, Catholics are less likely to rally to the side of ****philes, turning potentially devastating ire and scorn on the victims. To Gaylor, the New York Times stories this week of Eddie Long taking the pulpit amidst standing ovations and catcalls of love is déjà vu. “Some Protestants are where Catholics were twenty years ago,” she says. “We have a long ways to go.”
Both Catholic and Protestant clergy have ****ed about with kids. PS.The scurrying sound you just heard was medro burying his head in the sand
I am non religious but this does not surprise me at all. Stinking hypocrites. Id have them all shot. After an obligatory bum **** by a donkey.
Open minded in the same way that Fernando Torres is Chelsea's most prolific striker this season you mean?
This begs the question - would you rather be molested by a Protestant minister or a Catholic priest? The Protestant would probably be a bit dull and formulaic in his abuse, but he would probably use protection. Whereas the Catholic would insist on going in bareback, but he might at least treat you to some sacramental wine to lighten the mood. What do you reckon?
Let me put it simply to all your priest lovers. your all benders in reality and defending any of them is a joke, you should all start a foundation to help these priests rid the world of false accusations of molestation and to help fund cover ups ***s.
Your survival is assured in the Catholic Peado Club.....if you grass you will go to hell Proddies don't have the guilt thing so just bury the kids in the garden
