Yes. Would you? I presume you mean instead of Naylor? However what if Gunnarson or Kiss or both are out. Then id keep Naylor in , play Taylor on the left of midfield.
If reports from you guys are to believed, and I've no reason to doubt you, and what I heard on the radio, Lee had a good game. MM is a 'confidence booster', happily playing Gerrard ahead of Hudson. I think he'll put him in. I'm pretty confident in making single changes, possibly 2, but not sure how we'd fare if we needed to make 3-4 changes in the established side. If one of Kiss or Gunner make it, I'd play him. Kiss aggrevated an existing injury so we need to leave players fully recover and not take risks.
And push Cowie inside? I'd love to see him get a chance in centre mid, his immense work rate would surely be a bonus in the middle of the park. If we don't need Taylor in midfield I'd put him back at LB. As well as Naylor played Taylor is quicker and I always like to see a bit of pace in defence.
No...............and I did mean instead of Taylor. Only one game I know, but Nayls played so well on Sunday after all the **** he's taken (rightfully so), that he deserves another start straight away. However, our midfield injury situation may make the question academic and you could be right about using Taylor there - he could be very useful.
Stev - im not sure Taylor is quicker than Naylor. Id prefer Taylor. But I dont think one of Taylors attributes is pace. Dont get me wrong hes no snail but hardly quick. The system we play though I dont see any of our full backs letting us down.
Really? I know Taylor is hardly Usain Bolt but I'd say he's quicker than Naylor. Maybe I just have a false impression of how slow Naylor is after some of the 'performances' last year. Taylor 'seems' to recover better when beaten which I had put down mainly to superior pace.
