A few months ago, if someone had said the words "Ashbee leaving" I would have thought it was the end of civilisation as we know it. Ash was the rock at the centre of things, the inspirational captain around whom the team gelled and whose influence was the core of our success. And that simply was the way it was. To remove Ash would be to tear the heart out from the team and leave it floundering.
But more recently, our starting eleven has borne no relationship to the 'old' City that got promoted to the PL. Only one player (Dawson) survives from that era. Everyone else was brought in by Pearson in the last few months. So, to them, Ash is probably just 'another player', not the legend that we all think of him as.
So, if he does go to Preston, will it really have the disastrous effect on morale and cohesion that some (including myself) have feared? Or will it be like removing the stopper in a bottle and bring fresh new life to our team, perhaps freeing up other players to come into their best role more?
Could it actually be for the best???
But more recently, our starting eleven has borne no relationship to the 'old' City that got promoted to the PL. Only one player (Dawson) survives from that era. Everyone else was brought in by Pearson in the last few months. So, to them, Ash is probably just 'another player', not the legend that we all think of him as.
So, if he does go to Preston, will it really have the disastrous effect on morale and cohesion that some (including myself) have feared? Or will it be like removing the stopper in a bottle and bring fresh new life to our team, perhaps freeing up other players to come into their best role more?
Could it actually be for the best???