The Dame is our bargain, says the Mail: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...s-secure-precious-away-win-bid-beat-drop.html Some safety and a big lift for Tuesday's game, fot the Yorkshire Post: http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/spor...-city-2-tigers-grab-safety-lifeline-1-7229170 'Crucial role' for the officials, in the Telegraph: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...eree-Mark-Clattenburg-sparks-controversy.html The Dame's goals could be 'priceless', according the the Express: http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/572928/Crystal-Palace-Hull-N-Doye City gain a breathing space, says the Independent: http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...ital-win-in-battle-for-survival-10204014.html The Guardian: 'vital' - http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/apr/25/crystal-palace-hull-city-premier-league-match-report
Funny how the somewhat one-sided one in the Telegraph talks about all the debatable refereeing decisions that went City's way, but fails to mention the blatant handball in the box that we should have had a pen for, isn't it?
The conspiracy stories in the comments on the Mail and Telegraph pages are hilarious. Our win is down to Clattenburg's bias because: a) He comes from Newcastle and this was to gain revenge on Pardew. b) He was recently banned for attending a concert after missing an elbow in the face of Spironi verses West Brom and Colin grassed him up. c) He hates foreign footballers. (Which we, presumably, don't have). I'm going for b). Revenge being a dish best served cold and all that. Oh. And against a club which the person he's gaining revenge on, no longer manages.
