1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Apparently we have signed midfielder GELSON FERNANDES

Discussion in 'Leicester City' started by FosseFilberto, Jul 25, 2011.

  1. FosseFilberto

    FosseFilberto Pizzeria Superiore and some ...
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    73,757
    Likes Received:
    39,163
  2. FoxyJim

    FoxyJim Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    1
    how many defensive midfielders do we need?Oakley, Abe andnow this guy. Good player and all that but we need strikers!!! surely if this is true then its the end of oakley who wouldnt get a look in.
     
    #2
  3. Emilio_Ivanhoe_Heskeynho

    Emilio_Ivanhoe_Heskeynho Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree we need strikers but neither Oakley or Abe are up to the defensive midfield role.

    And I don't believe Talksport for one minute.
     
    #3
  4. FoxyJim

    FoxyJim Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    1
    this was talked about in papers though and other sites i remember so who knows? The point is though Oakley and Abe are by definition defensive midfielders, they certainly are not attacking, neither is fernandes, so seems strange. But hey I think Sven wants a big powerful squad full of quality to cope with the rigours of the season. But I feel we really really need a top-drawer striker before the start of the season to complete the squad,and ideally a right winger to play on the opoosite guide to gallagher.

    the way i see it the starting 11 is 2 short of being very very good

    schmiechel
    konchesky
    mills
    bamba
    pantsil
    danns
    wellens
    king
    gallagher
    CF
    RW
     
    #4
  5. Emilio_Ivanhoe_Heskeynho

    Emilio_Ivanhoe_Heskeynho Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    0
    <ok>

    I have a feeling that Nugent, or god forbid, Vassell, will fill that RW spot though.

    Abe and Oakley aren't attacking midfielders but neither are they quite defensive, I don't think they excell in either way. I think they are both decent centre midfielders who can pass the ball and tackle, but neither to an outstanding extent. For example - King excells in going forward and scoring, Danns is a very good dribbler and runner with the ball, and Wellens stands out for his vision and passing. A true defensive midfield option would be nice, however I don't see Konchesky or Pantsil being quite as attacking as Naughton and PVA were, and I also think our defending in general will be better, so maybe a defensive midfielder won't be neccessary.
     
    #5
  6. leicester_ed

    leicester_ed Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,786
    Likes Received:
    286
    good player... but why?? unnecessary.
     
    #6
  7. FoxyJim

    FoxyJim Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Messages:
    254
    Likes Received:
    1
    agree with every word, see what you mean now mate.An out and out nailed on holding player who does nothing but hold may be a good ploy, especially in some away games. King wellens and danns is a fairly attacking midfield to be fair, so we need steel too in some games. Another reason why Sven is a football manager and i am not.
     
    #7
  8. Emilio_Ivanhoe_Heskeynho

    Emilio_Ivanhoe_Heskeynho Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    0
    <ok>
     
    #8
  9. THE FOXES 1884

    THE FOXES 1884 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    4,593
    Likes Received:
    185
    Who ? Don´t we need a left sided mid player & a forward ?

    SGE must know what he´s doing & no doubt he´s had a chat with the thai´s & got the O.K to go & get these players, 9 with this one.

    :emoticon-0110-tongu
     
    #9
  10. THE FOXES 1884

    THE FOXES 1884 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    4,593
    Likes Received:
    185
    ...or 11 if you count Ball & Tunch :emoticon-0100-smile.

    :emoticon-0110-tongu
     
    #10

  11. Lord_Dyer

    Lord_Dyer Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,668
    Likes Received:
    0
    #11
  12. Joethemightyone_LCFC

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    229
    Likes Received:
    0
    I reckon he would be a quality signing and another one that is Prem ready should we go up!

    Abe is not a CDM! He doesn't tackle enough! Oakley I like but I don't see where he is going to play?!
     
    #12
  13. Lord_Dyer

    Lord_Dyer Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,668
    Likes Received:
    0
    Derby?
     
    #13
  14. HesNotGudjonsonn

    HesNotGudjonsonn New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    I just wanted to say that I have seen people questioning why we would go for Gelson when we have Abe and Oakley, simple He is better and to move forward and improve we need better than what we have. Each step up is a step forward. Would you rather have Andy King or Stephen Hughes, Elvis Hammond or David Nugent, Matt Mills or Brian Carey, Kasper Schmeichal or my mum? We know he is gonna get a striker and seriously we all know it will be Maynard within a week or so and I'm sure he will get a winger if that is the formation he is opting for but for the time being lets really enjoy ourselves. After all it has been since March 16th 2001 when Roy Essandah started our 8 year hardship with a fluke goal.
     
    #14
  15. Barwellfox

    Barwellfox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,814
    Likes Received:
    413
    [NSFW]Kasper Schmeichal or my mum[/NSFW]

    whats your mum look like, and is she related to Top
     
    #15
  16. Emilio_Ivanhoe_Heskeynho

    Emilio_Ivanhoe_Heskeynho Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,987
    Likes Received:
    0
    That was my first reaction too <laugh>

    We are a seedy bunch ;)
     
    #16

Share This Page