Just when everything seems rosy in our garden comes this: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...coin-25m-from-Joey-Bartons-free-transfer.html Let's hope it's another load of bollox from The Sun...
There does appear to be some thing that needs to be clarified -see other thread. This is the problem with an artificial deadline, it's like shopping at 5pm on Christmas Eve; no time or inclination to read small print.
I read a report the weekend before the deadline that said McKay stood to make £600k from the deal, it was in The Sun, now it's £1.3 million. Nothing has been confirmed or denied, they do however say no rules have been broken so is it just another sensational story to shyte-stir? It has to be us caught up in it...
If anyone thought that Joey's transfer was 'free' then they've been living in cloud cuckoo land with Tango & Cash for too long. Off course there are fees and signing on fees being payed out!! This is news! Tabloid journalism again, just like the Taarabt seeking pay rise from the Mail.
What is with the Sun?..they have already made complete idiots out of themselves with the 15 point deduction and now this.Im not suprised this sort of thing is banding about,but if it is a big dodgy,I cant see much more than a fine or the Agent getting done?..Not sure the FA are going to want to have another legal tennis match with the Mittal lawyers!.....Anyway,only at QPR lads
Youi have to remember that this is The "QPR will definitely be docked 15 Points" Sun. It is also noticeable that the "article" has no option where the readers can post their own views, which is standard on all articles - except for those which might cause problems due to ongoing court cases. So why can't anyone post anything? Maybe they would have to edit out all the posts from QPR fans pointing out how wrong they were with the "definitely docked 15 points" crap in the spring. Some things to remember about Rob Beasley: please log in to view this image Rob Beasley is an ardent Chelsea fan (what a surprise!) He has been known to act as a mouthpiece for anything that Chelsea want publicized or "spun" in a certain way. He is known for making up quotes and "stealing" from copy in other newspapers. He often crops up with very negative stories about Wenger and Ferguson. Surprisingly Chelsea don't have similar **** stirring stories written about them. He has been known to make up crap/lie on "The Sunday Supplement". He has been known to apologise afterwards, but it seems that his modus operandi is to lie, then apologise in private afterwards. So, when you see the name Rob Beasley, (NOT to be confused with Ron Weasley), then remember that he lies, cheats and works for Chelsea.
I notice the article doesn't quote the FA, but follows the FA's statement refusing to confirm or deny with "However our sources say..." It's shallow and meaningless.
The title of this thread is misleading. It says "Another FA Investigation?" It should say ... "Chelsea supporting hack tries to force FA into investigation of QPR for no reason (other than he is working for Abramovich)." Yes, I know it's far too long, but it does convey the true validity of the article.
Rob Beasley Rob Beasley Rob Beasley Rob Beasley Rob Beasley Rob Beasley Rob Beasley Rob Beasley Rob Beasley Rob Beasley umm .. I know lets kill him.
