West London player ratings:
“Andre Dozzell: 4
Was largely an anonymous figure in midfield”
Honestly that’s generous. I remember him trying and failing to tackle someone and trying and failing to win a header in the first ten and nothing else at all for 97 minutes.
All of the WLS ratings were generous. Mostly 5 or 6 out of 10, which would imply some sort of draw or close defeat. If you get 5 or 6 for a 4-0 loss, what's needed to see some scores of 2 or 3?
Gubbins, bless him, deserved a -3. But he’s 22 rather than some 17-year-old thrown in during a flu outbreak.
He gets a bonus point from me for nominative determinism. So -2.
He looked totally disinterested to me, I could make a couple of tackles in a match but given what an important creative role he’s supposed to have he offers absolutely nothing to the team.
Or his Dad and our DOF were mates?His career stats are quite something. Three goals and four assists in 165 pro career games. 2 and 2 in 92 Championship games. 1 assist and no goals in 53 League One games. Did we just buy him because his dad was once fairly good?
If Colbeck is at least 50% fit Dozzell won't be playingCould I have an honest Dozzell assessment from someone watching the game today please?
If Colbeck is at least 50% fit Dozzell won't be playing
True, I tried to wipe the Watford debacle out of my mind,The Duke certainly got stuck In and ran around a lot neither of which Dozzell managedClive reckons he won’t be in until Ipswich earliest but I’m hopeful The Duke will start in his place after 45 minutes of looking vaguely like a footballer.
Why is he always fit and available ffs