Ratings out of 10, any you disagree with, as found on Goal. com Team Rating *Attitude to Fans. 6.5 "Can't Stand" Factor 6.0 Management. 6.5 Spending Power. 6.5 Stability 6.0 Stadium. 7.0 Support. 6.5 Kit Design. 5.5 Use of Funds 6.0 Website Quality. 6.5 Worldwide Reach 5.5 Youth System 6.0
neutrals point of view i would say its a mags point of view ffs 7 for stadium apart from the Emirates its the best in the country What are the scums ratings
Uhm I really don't think so. If you're going to complain about possibly biased viewpoints, at least try and remain unbiased yourself. I'd say it's a fair rating. If 5 is average, then the 6's are above average, so what do you expect? Not sure about the 'worldwide reach' though.
i am not biased but i would like to see the full ratings of everyone to make a honest opinion My favourite ground is the Emirates and on the other hand i can't see why Old Trafford is supposed to be so good As for stability i would say we are one of the most stable clubs in the premiership.
Reeeeally? Im sorry, but your ground is dull. Just like all the bowl stadiums these days. Its hardly any different to Darlo's, Southamptons, and The Smoggies.
Mate, how have I come on here to WUM? Its not like ive singled out JUST your ground as being naff is it? Idiot.
Mate, Idiot, make your mind up or you won't get very far in your quest for world domination of the hotel world.
There are so many different things to rate under 'stadium', so who knows. Capacity, cleanliness, quality, atmosphere, pitch are all factors. I'd imagine SJP being up near there for at least a number of those points (I hope). You've yoyo'd in and out of the EPL over the past few years, and I presume that your mid-season slump put an end to any feelings of stability for this season. Nothing is ever dull in the North East and I don't think that either club will ever score high on stability for that. Leave the 8's and 9's to teams like Man Utd, Arsenal and even Everton who have been very stable and consistent in pretty much every way for a number of years. Managers, finances, league positions, performances and so on. I'd imagine that higher scores will go to the likes of Arsenal, Manchester United and even Southampton. Ashley Cole Jack Wilshere Niall Quinn Cesc Fabregas Ryan Giggs Paul Scholes Gary Neville David Beckham Gerard Pique Gareth Bale Theo Walcott Alan Shearer
Sid James Park is a hideous lopsided carbuncle due to its location and planning restrictions, I don't know how you criticise the SoL, it is quite aesthetic
So it's a 'hideous carbuncle' because one side is larger than the other? How is that a factor in scoring a stadium? I think it's rather distinguished, myself . Anyway, aesthetic is only one small factor. I doubt people score stadiums based on how pretty the construction of it looks. And I didn't criticise the SoL. I just said that there's more factors to a stadium than just how pretty and modern it looks, which is why it might not be scored as high as some other stadiums in England. That's all.
sorry chappaz, my comment should have been addressed to PhilThompsonsNose not yourself. I find these types of polls a bit hollow without terms of reference and at least a small explanation of the rationale on how they reached their decision. One mans cheese is another mans chalk
Taking into cosideration the building costs, and value for money, I thing Sunderland wins hands down. the Emirates what was it over £450,000,000 [ still paying for ? not sure ] the SOL,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,£15,000,000 approx, [ paid for ] one of the things we should thank Bob Murray for, I know I do.
