1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

5 Subs again next season?

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by Mr. Shoes, Apr 29, 2012.

  1. Mr. Shoes

    Mr. Shoes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,545
    Likes Received:
    846
    Hopefully the stupid 5 subs rule will go, and back to 7.

    Anyone know if the clubs want it to stay?
     
    #1
  2. JoelTheTiger

    JoelTheTiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,092
    Likes Received:
    1,030
    Back to 7 apparently.
     
    #2
  3. pock tiger 64

    pock tiger 64 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2011
    Messages:
    333
    Likes Received:
    0
    laughable four unused subs atleast every week
     
    #3
  4. Chazz Rheinhold

    Chazz Rheinhold Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    58,703
    Likes Received:
    56,902
    Agree. I would like to see it go back to 1 sub. Ok and a reserve goalie. Half the subs they use nowadays just to wast time. More professional cheating is all it is.
     
    #4
  5. King Curtis

    King Curtis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    5,457
    Likes Received:
    1,290
    I think it's good if it moves back to 7. Yeah there's 4 unused players but you have more options to choose from should you want to make a sub and gives 2 more players the opportunity of been in the match day squad. I know from this season supporters have wanted it moved to 7 subs.
     
    #5
  6. Proud Tiger

    Proud Tiger Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2011
    Messages:
    4,047
    Likes Received:
    13
  7. MikeHull

    MikeHull Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2011
    Messages:
    624
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don t see why it changed, more options means that you can maybe stick a youth player on the bench to get used to bench warming. If it was due to money with clubs not being able to afford the extra two players then they could name two subs if they want, 7 being the max. Dont know why it was ever changed
     
    #7
  8. Putter65

    Putter65 Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Messages:
    936
    Likes Received:
    33
    good
     
    #8
  9. Dr.Stanley O'Google, HCFC

    Dr.Stanley O'Google, HCFC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    17,041
    Likes Received:
    3,374
    I understood it was due to L1 and L2 clubs (being the majority) wanting it?
     
    #9
  10. PLT

    PLT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    27,183
    Likes Received:
    18,375
    True but it's stupid that young players can't make the bench and get in the team when they otherwise could with 7 subs. Look at Cullen he's our best example. Every time he's been on the bench it's been a game we've needed a goal at the end so he's either thrown on with the impossible task of scoring with no support or he doesn't get on at all. If we were allowed 7 subs he'd have been on the bench pretty much every game since he came back from Bury and he'd have been able to come on in the games we've been ahead in near the end.
     
    #10

  11. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,917
    Likes Received:
    76,748
    The Championship teams voted for seven subs, the majority of League One/Two teams voted for five.

    The problem the FA now have, is having different rules in the Championship to the other two leagues and as far as I'm aware, they haven't yet resolved the issue.
     
    #11
  12. The FRENCH TICKLER

    The FRENCH TICKLER Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    22,910
    Likes Received:
    614
    Its already been confirmed that its back to 7 subs from next season. Nick told Burnsie live on air weeks ago.
     
    #12
  13. The FRENCH TICKLER

    The FRENCH TICKLER Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    22,910
    Likes Received:
    614

    Correct. It should never have been changed. Many championship clubs wanted 7 kept but were out voted by the lower leagues. ffs, you dont even have to name 7 if you dont want to or are unable to. This should not even have been an issue this season.
     
    #13
  14. The FRENCH TICKLER

    The FRENCH TICKLER Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    22,910
    Likes Received:
    614
    OLM is too old to be considered for the subs bench. :shocked: <whistle> :emoticon-0106-cryin <laugh> :emoticon-0149-no:
     
    #14
  15. The FRENCH TICKLER

    The FRENCH TICKLER Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    22,910
    Likes Received:
    614

    No change was needed. The league 1 and 2 clubs should have been told just to name 5 subs then.

    ffs, it was kept at 7 for the 2 cup competitions. TYpical of the Football League who changed it and the FA for allowing it.
     
    #15
  16. KC Kid

    KC Kid Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    14
    Why not just make it a range - you must have at least 3 and no more than 7. End of.
     
    #16
  17. The FRENCH TICKLER

    The FRENCH TICKLER Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    22,910
    Likes Received:
    614
    Agreed. But thats far to easy for the FA/FL to approve. Lol.
     
    #17
  18. RicardoHCAFC

    RicardoHCAFC Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    10,311
    Likes Received:
    454
    It can't be an FA problem, the PL has 7 and the other 3 leaues have 5. And it can't be a FL problem either, because we have different financial rules to L1 and L2.

    The reason it was reduced to 5 was because enough clubs agreed that by being allowed to name 7 it encouraged overspending, as if you didn't spend the money needed to name 7 professionals as subs you were disadvantaged when you played clubs who did as they'd have more ability to change things from the bench.
     
    #18
  19. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,917
    Likes Received:
    76,748
    I meant FL, rather than FA.

    As far as I was aware, all FL chairmen voted and as a result of that vote, the FL decided to revert to seven subs in the Championship only, but I've never actually seen that confirmed anywhere.
     
    #19
  20. Cortez91

    Cortez91 Moderator
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2011
    Messages:
    9,177
    Likes Received:
    3,717
    I'm sure I read somewhere it was going back to seven.

    It should never have gone back to 5, because whilst the rules state a maximum of seven subs, you dont have to name seven, the L1 and 2 clubs can just put five on the bench if they are worrying about finances or whatever.
     
    #20

Share This Page