1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

451

Discussion in 'Queens Park Rangers' started by RuislipRanger, Dec 10, 2011.

  1. RuislipRanger

    RuislipRanger Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    840
    Likes Received:
    1
    Just got back and have to say that I think colin got the tatics wrong again today.Why does he keep playing 451 when all it did today was invite Liverpool forward and gives us nothing.We seem totally lost when we play that formation. As soon as he bought DJ on and went to 442 we looked a different team,this has happened now at Fulham and Tottenham.Bothroyd cannot play upfront on his own ,in fact today I thought he was awful. SWP and Mackie are not quick enough in this formation to give us surprise counter attacks. Please NW stick to 442.
     
    #1
  2. Swords Hoopster

    Swords Hoopster New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    5,942
    Likes Received:
    7
    North must be loving these threads!! <laugh>
     
    #2
  3. RuislipRanger

    RuislipRanger Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    840
    Likes Received:
    1
    Why does he keep persisting with it,the players look totally at sea with it.
     
    #3
  4. rangercol

    rangercol Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    36,051
    Likes Received:
    19,651
    To be fair, he really only had Bothroyd to play there after HH dropped out. Not sure about SWP "not being quick enough"....he must be one of the quickest in the league!
    However, I do agree that NW seems to be struggling a little of late, although to balance that, he hasn't had a lot to pick from and it will be interesting to see how he does with (hopefully) a better squad after January.
     
    #4
  5. rangercol

    rangercol Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    36,051
    Likes Received:
    19,651
    For fear of repeating myself.....4-2-3-1 would work with an in form Adel in the middle of the 3!
     
    #5
  6. Star of David Bardsley

    Star of David Bardsley 2023 Funniest Poster

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    70,126
    Likes Received:
    57,643
    We tried 4-4-2, got totally over-run in midfield and had to revert to the 4-2-3-1/4-4-1-1/4-5-1 or whatever it was. With the players at our disposal today (assuming Campbell wasn't fit to start) we had one recognised striker.
     
    #6
  7. Star of David Bardsley

    Star of David Bardsley 2023 Funniest Poster

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    70,126
    Likes Received:
    57,643
    You can't carry players every other week at this level. As fantastic a player as he is sometimes he's a liability in many games and it's just not worth playing with 10 men when he doesn't fancy it.
     
    #7
  8. RuislipRanger

    RuislipRanger Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    840
    Likes Received:
    1
    Agree Col about the players available but what a difference when we went with two upfront.They looked nervous towards the end.
     
    #8
  9. Swords Hoopster

    Swords Hoopster New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    5,942
    Likes Received:
    7
    Are you feeling alright Ruislip? :emoticon-0107-sweat
     
    #9
  10. rangercol

    rangercol Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    36,051
    Likes Received:
    19,651
    Who started up front with Bothroyd Watford if it was 4-4-2 at the start?
     
    #10

  11. Star of David Bardsley

    Star of David Bardsley 2023 Funniest Poster

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    70,126
    Likes Received:
    57,643
    Smith on the left, SWP on the right, Mackie up top was how I saw it for the first 10 mins or so. We hardly got the ball out of our own third anyway but that's what I thought we were trying to do.
     
    #11
  12. RuislipRanger

    RuislipRanger Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    840
    Likes Received:
    1
    We were 451 til he bought on DJ.Sorwds,he is quick but not like he used to be.When he goes on a run now he can never quite make it all the way and ends up stopping and passing.I think hes a good player and much better than we had before but when you play 451 and attack on the counter you need players with pace ie Sinclair and Dyer.
     
    #12
  13. RuislipRanger

    RuislipRanger Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    840
    Likes Received:
    1
    Apologies "Swords".
     
    #13
  14. Northolt-QPR

    Northolt-QPR Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    7,806
    Likes Received:
    20
    Better not.
     
    #14
  15. awjm

    awjm Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2011
    Messages:
    6,056
    Likes Received:
    2,794
    I feel it's still worth bringing Adel on as a later substitute, especially if nothing is working or we're already winning. We need to see if he's got anything to offer still. With that said, he doesn't deserve infinite chances... but maybe just a few more.
     
    #15
  16. SW Ranger

    SW Ranger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    7,264
    Likes Received:
    7,989
    The only problem with that analysis col is that Adel isn't in form!
     
    #16
  17. qpr1954

    qpr1954 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    861
    Likes Received:
    19
    Has a deal been done for Adel in January, and that's the reason he is not even in the squad so he doesn't get injured and said deal falls through?
     
    #17
  18. qprbeth

    qprbeth Wicked Witch of West12
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2011
    Messages:
    15,007
    Likes Received:
    13,622
    I thought Adel was injured in training yesterday.
     
    #18
  19. WBA2_QPR3

    WBA2_QPR3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    7,479
    Likes Received:
    3,833
    Come on we can all read between the lines on the adel situation, he has agreed terms elsewhere and won't play for us again. A real shame as he had a good run prior to the fulham game and I was hoping he would come back again. It would appear not
     
    #19

Share This Page