1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

4 million

Discussion in 'Sunderland' started by BishopSAFC, Aug 11, 2014.

  1. BishopSAFC

    BishopSAFC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    268
    Westham you are having a laff **** offfffffffffffffffffffff
     
    #1
  2. Commachio

    Commachio Rambo 2021

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    92,685
    Likes Received:
    43,150
    Why what's happened?<whistle>
     
    #2
  3. Red and White Mac

    Red and White Mac Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,330
    Likes Received:
    20
    we would get more than that if we kept him this year and lost him on a free next year with the compensation we would get
     
    #3
  4. E.T. Fairfax

    E.T. Fairfax Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    8,458
    Likes Received:
    10,336
    I'm beginning to think that it wasn't a serious offer from West Ham! I think they are just trying to dip their toe in the water whilst at he same time trying to rock the boat!
     
    #4
  5. grandpops

    grandpops Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2013
    Messages:
    10,573
    Likes Received:
    4,565
    I think you`ll find they`ve already been told something like that.
     
    #5
  6. Home_and_Away

    Home_and_Away Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2013
    Messages:
    4,492
    Likes Received:
    2,605
    West Ham are ready to call Sunderland's bluff over Connor Wickham, with the Black Cats unwilling to budge on their £8million valuation.

    The east Londoners are ready to wait until the final week of the transfer window to test whether the Wearsiders really are willing to risk losing the striker on a free next summer.

    Wickham has just a year left on his contract and has so far refused to commit himself to the club who bought him from Ipswich for £8m three years ago.

    West Ham, looking for a replacement for the injured Andy Carroll, have already had a £5m bid turned down for Wickham.

    The 21-year-old is understood to be keen on a move down to London, but the Hammers believe Sunderland want too much for him - given that he scored only five league goals last season.



    http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/west-ham-playing-connor-wickham-4051275#ixzz3AP7q17uH
    Follow us: @DailyMirror on Twitter | DailyMirror on Facebook
     
    #6
  7. Blunham Mackem

    Blunham Mackem Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    10,790
    Likes Received:
    4,922
    Call our bluff? Gus wants to keep him for gods sake.

    So yeh, **** off!

    And anyway, why sign up for a manager with a short shelf-life?
     
    #7

Share This Page