1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

4-2-3-1 or time for 4-4-2

Discussion in 'Manchester United' started by Treble, Dec 14, 2015.

  1. Treble

    Treble Keyser Söze

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    57,183
    Likes Received:
    47,997
    Putting aside differences about the dutch quiff and just considering what might suit LVG's approach, wouldnt it be more successful playing 4-4-2 ??

    Firstly 1 striker up front means we're creating fewer chances and also not troubling defences. Secondly he clearly likes his wide players so why not have proper wing play. Thirdly a front 2 will pull defences while the 2 midfielders will have more options - either through the middle or out wide. I also think Schneiderlin will be the ideal box to box midfielder.

    It also means we can rotate Carrick and Schweinsteiger better.

    The only two flaws I can see are the RW position and whether Mata can play in a 4 man midfield. My answer is that I think Mata has proved to be very versatile and can play that midfield role next to Schneid, and lets not forget we would have Herrera as an alternative.
    I'm willing to give Young a go on the RW bcos in a 4-4-2 bcos he would stand a much better chance of being effective there...both in terms of pace and the options he'll have in midfield and up front.

    Finally, it shows intent and a bit of balls. That's not a dig at LVG but maybe he needs to show that intent.
     
    #1
  2. UnitedinRed

    UnitedinRed Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2012
    Messages:
    25,308
    Likes Received:
    1,218
    Can't hurt. Were not getting much luck from the 4321 just now so a change might give the team a boost.

    Even 433, a proper one would be welcomed. Depending on personnel of course.
     
    #2
  3. Treble

    Treble Keyser Söze

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    57,183
    Likes Received:
    47,997
    Just to add to the point. I heard earlier, Leicester have conceded almost same number of goals as they did at this point last season.

    Playing 4-4-2 does have its advantages. Attacking football wins the day. Btw before anyone says, I am sure our back 4 would concede less.
     
    #3
  4. shwan

    shwan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Messages:
    4,648
    Likes Received:
    126
    this formation 4231 may work facing good sides, but with most of teams we need more players upfront, and 442 fit the bill
     
    #4
  5. glazerfodder

    glazerfodder Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2011
    Messages:
    5,113
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    4 - 4 - 2 If I'm not mistaken , historically this has been our most successful formation. It also seems to be returning in many of the top flight European sides, so woorth a go for a few games at least...................so he won't do it, guaranteed.
     
    #5
  6. Swarbs

    Swarbs Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,533
    Likes Received:
    1,371
    0-1-9 please.

    ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK

    <ok>
     
    #6
  7. Chief

    Chief Northern Simpleton
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    39,260
    Likes Received:
    27,055
    I'd love to see us play 4 4 2 but we don't have the wingers at the moment unfortunately and it would leave a couple of players, namely Mata and Herrera, out in the cold as I don't see where they'd play as neither is really a winger.

    For now I think 4 2 3 1 best suits the players, but that is on the proviso that Herrera is one of the 2 and Mata is in the middle of the 3, in my opinion.

    4 3 3 is good too.
     
    #7
  8. HRH Custard VC

    HRH Custard VC National Car Park Attendant

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    28,168
    Likes Received:
    12,116
    Why attack, 0-0 games are great for my match day threads
     
    #8

Share This Page