What should Cotts pick for Tuesday? They've lost Clarke but still have Wilson so they will be very good going forward but don't think we should set up to stop them. We're the home team so we should go at um! For me it would be a diamond 4-4-2 a bit like it was at Tamworth. Moore El-Abd Flint Williams Bryan Wagstaff Elliott Cunningham JET Baldock Barnett Fielding Moloney Carey Gillett Pack Bryan Burns
That's what I said in the other thread, whatever it was, it obviously worked, we looked more solid and we offered a bit more of a goal threat
I'd drop al he needs to sort himself out have Williams in instead if he stops passing back to keeper or flint all the time Flint is never gonna be the one that passes ball nicely out of defebce his job is to lump it straight back to where it came from or into the stands
I thought that Baldock, Barnett and JET, worked well playing together, especially with burns playing on the wing.
I'm probably one of Burns biggest fan. He always lifts me of my seat when he comes on I rate him better than Albert. But my concern is a starting line up with him in it goes wrong the crowd quickly turns. Look at AEA (can't remember his his proper name) and W Elliott both came with big reputations from their previous clubs, and we turn against them within a few games. Sure some players have a few games Fielding was the same, we turned on him and every time the ball went close we gasped or even worse booed like we did with Flint yesterday. We are not the best fans for getting behind the players. When both of them joined we was bigging them up. We had thread after thread wanting Flint to join. Baldock being another one, when he signed most of us was ****ing ourselves saying we will tear this division apart. Fast forward one year we have threads at half time rubbishing him?
I said "I" which is my opinion not yours. I'm also talking about a future as well. At least he don't run off the pitch when running down the wing. We all have different opinions, I don't laugh at yours. It's a lesson in life just because people don't agree with you, don't mock them, unless it's RR. Otherwise you will become like RP
SC clearly doesn't rate him, he's hardly set the world alight whilst playing apart from his goal against the blue few
ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww someones time of the month Just don't know how you can say Burns is better based on 4 or 5 games. Most being late sub appearances over someone who played over 130 games for us and who scored almost 20 goals..... Baffling
That's not to say I don't think he will be a better player than Albert in the future but to compare the 2 at the movement.... Well Albert will win at everything...
I said I'm talking about future as well. You loved Albert I liked him, you love Marv I like him. See different opinions . You wanted Flint to be captain before you saw him play
Moore Moloney,Flint,ElAbd,Cunningham. Burns,Marv,Pack,Jet(Diamond) Baldock and Barnett. I could even put up with Wagstaff starting (just) instead of Burns in a 3-5-2 and using Burns as a sub 2nd half. But sure as hell I don't want Gillett or W Elliot anywhere near the starting 11. They both do the same job - badly.
Albert is a different level to the above as was Bolasie As is carey a different level to the boys at the back which is baffling me when we sit at the bottom SC is not calling on his experiance.
