1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

2013 Ashes | 2nd test | Match Thread

Discussion in 'Norwich City' started by Bath-Canary, Jul 16, 2013.

  1. Guru of Ipswich

    Guru of Ipswich Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    6,121
    Likes Received:
    485
    I think this time yesterday we would have all given our right arms off for a total just fractionally over 300, so 361 is a huge effort.

    need to get a early wicket, just to unsettle them. can't wait to see swanny on this wicket.
     
    #101
  2. johnnywarksmoustache

    johnnywarksmoustache Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    22,716
    Likes Received:
    9,653
    Unfortunately Guru most of our Top Order played like they had no arms yesterday!
     
    #102
  3. Walsh.i.am

    Walsh.i.am Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    17,327
    Likes Received:
    8,162
    So, Aussie opener Rogers was given out LBW.
    In this case, lingham before wicket <yikes>
     
    #103
  4. Bath-Canary

    Bath-Canary Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    3,065
    Likes Received:
    373
    Watson put Rogers in a difficult position by reviewing that, the Aussie need to learn to review when they think they're not out not when the wish they were.
    That said I feel sorry for Hughes there I'd be livid if that was and English batsman.
     
    #104
  5. canary_max

    canary_max Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    5,659
    Likes Received:
    45
    yes got him!

    long way to go, but our 360-ish is looking alright
     
    #105
  6. yarco canary

    yarco canary Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    3,047
    Likes Received:
    92
    #106
  7. Guru of Ipswich

    Guru of Ipswich Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    6,121
    Likes Received:
    485
    To any aussie cricketers out there, a quick guide to the review system!

    If the oppo batsman is given not out and you think he is = review
    If you are given out and don't think you are out = review

    Its not that bloody hard is it!
     
    #107
  8. Bath-Canary

    Bath-Canary Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    3,065
    Likes Received:
    373
    Fantastic Khawaja gone, better than Cowan?
     
    #108
  9. Guru of Ipswich

    Guru of Ipswich Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    6,121
    Likes Received:
    485
    Follow on anybody?
     
    #109
  10. Bath-Canary

    Bath-Canary Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    3,065
    Likes Received:
    373
    England's review policy that the bowler, captain and wicketkeeper all have to agree is excellent. Prior in particular is great at making the calls and with Cook at slip they have three different views of it.

    Feeling a lot more confident about 361 now I was worried we were 50/100 short as the pitch looked good for batting. We've had some luck but the bowlers have done well to keep the pressure up.
     
    #110

  11. Guru of Ipswich

    Guru of Ipswich Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    6,121
    Likes Received:
    485
    I presume in the case of us batting, both batsmen have to agree to review? very sensible approach.
     
    #111
  12. Norfolkbhoy

    Norfolkbhoy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2012
    Messages:
    1,590
    Likes Received:
    414
    i agree Bath - our total was probably 75 - 100 light but with them 4 down and Broad and Andersen yet to take a wicket things are looking prett rosy at the minute. If we can just eke Clarke out cheaply then we should be good for a nice healthy first innings lead. That said i'm sure i posted something along these lines in the last match and was proven to be way off the mark.
     
    #112
  13. johnnywarksmoustache

    johnnywarksmoustache Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    22,716
    Likes Received:
    9,653
    The Aussies have a short tail and they like to wag! <ok>
     
    #113
  14. Bath-Canary

    Bath-Canary Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    3,065
    Likes Received:
    373
    Luck they have a ****e top order then
     
    #114
  15. Bath-Canary

    Bath-Canary Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    3,065
    Likes Received:
    373
    Heya tail.
     
    #115
  16. Guru of Ipswich

    Guru of Ipswich Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    6,121
    Likes Received:
    485
    Smith Gone! 86-5!
     
    #116
  17. JKCanary

    JKCanary Guest

    Get in Swanny!

    If we get them out cheaply, I'm not sure I'd want to enforce the follow on - not if the wicket is supposed to be decent still.
     
    #117
  18. Walsh.i.am

    Walsh.i.am Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    17,327
    Likes Received:
    8,162
    England's first two sessions today <ok>

    Fast runs from Broad and Swann this morning and then Aus in tatters at 86-5.
    Follow on a distinct possibility .........?
     
    #118
  19. Bath-Canary

    Bath-Canary Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    3,065
    Likes Received:
    373
    Well now if we could take Clarke I'd say there's a good chance. We'd need to move through the tail quickly and I don't see us managing that, well not for 70 runs.
     
    #119
  20. Bath-Canary

    Bath-Canary Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    3,065
    Likes Received:
    373
    Scratch that, he's gone.
     
    #120

Share This Page