“United weren’t close to Man City”

Neither were Chelsea, Arsenal, Spurs or Liverpool.

 

Yeah but you spent 600 billion million pounds - the others didn't.

 

I didn’t know Van Dijk was bought on the cheap.

 

You pay players up to 500k a week ffs


VVD has been well worth his money. He's helped us get to a CL final. Enjoy the night mate - 26th May.

 

For the money you spent, and the manager you
have, Man Utd should not be finishing 18 odd pts
behind Citeh, and only 1-7 pts in front of Spurs.

 

What’s wages got to do with it, Stop believing everything that you read in the papers, You do know you spent over £50m on Keita.

 

What's wages got to do with it?

FFS.

 

You mentioned wages not me.

 

When talking about money in football you asked what have wages got to do with it..... wages are often more important than a contract fee as they add up over the contract length. People ignore this obvious fact.

500k a week equals £1 million every 2 weeks.

Liverpool's highest earner is on 175k a week (iirc).

You then mention Ketita for 50mil. I think he'll be on about 80-100k a week (not 100% sure but it'll be around that).

In laymen terms you could employ 5 Keita's to 1 Sanchez.

You understand that?

 

You don’t know what he’s on every week.

 

I know it's approx. 500k a week.

 

I’m sure it’s less than that to be fair,

 

I thought United and City were both in the same CITY...that place called Manchester.

 

Valium judging by most of his performances.

 

Do you know what he is on approx then ?

 

yeah but Chelsea, Arsenal, Spurs and Liverpool do not have a tedious **** for a manager so United deserve all the **** they get

 

It's actually 600 million billion.

 

Rattled to ****

 

I was giving Matth a free matths lesson as his names Matth.

 

Maths with Matths Mum.

35 + 34

Nom nom