Seems unlikely but.................... http://rokerreport.sbnation.com/2014/1/6/5281504/report-sunderland-reject-8m-striker-bid
He's only 26?! Christ. He really wouldn't look out of place standing next to a bunch of 40-year-olds.
I was mortified at the prospect of spending £6m on him. £8m would just be total lunacy, thank god it has been rejected if it was a legitimate bid.
Last week their fans thought he would be sold for around 6-7 million. Now all their fans think they should hold out for 10-12 million. If you feel like having a laugh. http://www.readytogo.net/smb/forums/pure-football.86/
Well that might be because Poyet has asked for a hell of a lot to consider selling him. Think the quote was 25m.
sunderland fans are as deluded as L**DS fans.............. apart from the fact that L**DS were actually good at 1 point.. and sunderland are well... sunderland
Can't we offer Graham in part-exchange for Fletcher? ... wait a minute Joe Kinnear is Director of Football at Newcastle not Sunderland!
Yes, I also heard Bruce say that we were not in for Fletcher, which made the report of us bidding £8m even more ridiculous. Might be Spurs, though God knows what they would want him for. All players are touted at outrageously inflated prices in this window, especially strikers, but this is just silly.
Yes, though I like the idea of offering Danny Graham in part exchange. Are Sunderland that stupid? Judging by the ones that come on here.................................!
Rhodes could well be our star summer signing. I would be surprised if the Tom CAIRNEY deal did mnot give us first choice when they sell Rhodes.