Separate names with a comma.
Well i didn't say that did i, i'm aware that Wissa won't be first 11 and will be back up to Isak, that's what we need. And even if we signed...
No they wouldn't because we play with one striker and they are both strikers they'd both be behind Isak, crikey, basic stuff.
Roy plz..so using that logic you only wanted us to sign a striker better than isak..good luck with that..
Yup..we've already got the best (or second) striker in the league..we need a good back up..wissa fits that perfectly, i'll say again for 40 mil or...
Yes but PSR innit, this is what we have to do..for now.
You loved Wilson and Wissa is basically the same profile, and age when we signed him, dunno why you are so negative about it.
[ATTACH]
You didnt rate Isak to be fair so...
"Chelsea interested in Wissa" in 3..2..1....
He fits in as back up/rotation to Isak and is a proven PL goalscorer, not even in a very good team. Not every signing can be young players.
[MEDIA] Somebody wants to sign for us.. [ATTACH]
He's the same age as Wilson when we signed him with a better prem record.
Wissa for 40 mil or under is great business tbh.
In the kebab?
Hope Liverpool enjoy the poundland Isak.
You're just guessing.
Hugo Ekishite am i right?
Australia are awful.
[MEDIA]
One of them could hijack the longstaff to leeds deal if they wanted, 70 mil should do it.
