Search results

40 years ago. Times have changed , sadly

We got by on Saturday. LB in particular was an issue. It'll effect Neil's confidence if he's left there many more games. Club always say they want to bring in quality. It's a football discuss on forum if we can't talk about a glaring weakness in out side I'm not what we can discuss. There were...

Lot of work in a short period of time.

I'm very agreeable :)

For all we know we could have been lowballibg clubs. No one knows why we've not brought in players and to say we certainly will later in window is wishful thinking. Nothing is certain apart from death and taxes. If they can't sign the right players the may need to adjust their plan to get them...

Maybe it's a first step. Rules on this and agents really needed. Agents should only be able to represent on side in a deal and should be paid by player only imo.

Derby got any full backs ;)

Imo that's what's wrong with transfer system. Chelsea have had players for 10 years and they've been out on loan the whole time nit making an appearance fir the club. It can be Good for the players. I hope they look at this and stop the practice of stockpiling players. Would help us as less...

That's how opinions work though isn't it. I believe one thing others may have a different view. If we have a list of players (speakman said we have) then we've had from may to get them in. As yet we've not signed one player permanently from another club. That can't have been the plan. LJ...

No its really not easy. No one at the club on the football side thinks it's a good idea to go into a season without key areas filled. There's a reason late signings get called panic buys.

I'm pointing out a huge error were making. I'm not the only one who feels this way. Just because we don't think everything's perfect it doesn't mean we're negative.

As we need backup I'd have thought we'd have gotten both. Be interesting to see who else they get if spurs lad comes in. Or will we look to "get by" with just one lb and hope he can play 40 odd games.

If they aren't deemed good enough or ready when we're playing players our of position they couldn't be when those players aren't available.

It's arguably easier to waste money late on when pressure builds to get players in. To suggest that we couldn't find one full back in world football available to us in our budget since may is just crazy.

Same talk as always. No one says they aren't buying :) wasn't that long ago he was saying he wasn't sleeping, then appeared to change his comments after telling off from the club. I've always posted what I feel and never slaged anyone off. If your resorting to name calling you've already lost imo.

Half of those would be sorted in due diligence of scouting. To suggest we couldn't get 1 suitable player in is ludicrous imo. Oh and Barcelona can't sign anyone ;)

We'll never know I suspect. But getting to point of signing a contract then pulling out for no other signing isn't a great look. Cirkin still hasn't signed either.

Ok then winchester came off on sat. If he's not fit to play and Neil gets a knock we'd be scratching around on Saturday. The recruitment team have known since may. We're still in this position.

I'm not suggesting buying anyone. Never have but ti suggest we've nit been able to properly strengthen to this point is wrong. For whatever reason we've chosen to leave it late. A few injuries and we're in real trouble.

I haven't followed every transfer so far in l1. There has been a lot of movement though. However there is a point of view that all l1 moves are poor and our business is better. Truth is there will have been players that could have improved us. Look at the deal we pulled out of with no deal for...