Separate names with a comma.
we are going out
yeah rio who blasted the ball "violently" into a spectators face and did not even get booked
yes death by firing squad, 6 ballboys with old leather laced balls
exactly <ok>
FA have got it in for chelsea
trouble is the FA do not need a leg to stand on, they are unanswerable
<laugh><laugh><laugh>.
you should go to spec savers mate
this is the FA going to war against chelsea
didn't deserve a red card let alone a ban.
they must all be blind, beggars belief that they even use the words "kicked the ball boy"
<ok> does common sense ever prevail though with the FA
the ball boy is not a player, it takes the whole thing to new levels, so how can you even begin to compare
what's it got to with you
if he had not of apologised you can guarantee he would of got an even longer ban even though he never even kicked him. he had no choice.
what ever contact he made it was so little that no way did it warrant a red card and that little tw@t rolling around like he had a kicking. Both...
so why did he roll around like hazard had broke a rib? the ballboy is a little t*sser and he has tarnished your victory.
he never kicked the ball boy but any body would think he had kicked him in the teeth !! imagine if a player did a cantona today? furkin ell he...
the funniest thing is that he didn't even kick him.
how ever many times i re watch it i can not even see him actually kick him
