Discussing politics on here

This '50 posters voted against' thing is mad... not all posters will have seen that thread.

Besides, I only use my mobile and polls don't even appear on my device so I'm sure others will be the same.

Continuing with that logic suggests you're the person that analysed the results of the name change survey for the Allams...

 

What was 'bollocks' about what I posted?

I thought it was reasonable as was the suggestion of appointing another mod to handle it.

So, if 41 people had voted for a politics thread and 40 had voted against it - you're saying that we would have had a politics thread?

 

Exactly, not everyone could vote or more importantly and likely, could be arsed to vote.

But in saying that, if you're declaring the use the figures from that poll as 'mad' then perhaps I'm not the only one talking bollocks.

 

The sort of logic that makes Bremainers think that the referendum vote should be ignored.

 

55%against/45%agsinst? So, a unanimous decision?

 

Ha. Where have I heard that before?

I was responding to DMD asking about whether politics should be allowed on the forum.

At no point have I suggested another poll (at the time did I realise that my poll was some sort of concrete 'once in a generation' plebliscite).

 

Yes. I forgot that UKIP were planning to fold if they 'lost' that referendum.

 

Typical authoritarian vote counting if I have ever seen it.

 

Politics!
You're barred

 

So...is this Politics or Local Interest?

UKIP MEP Mike Hookem denies assaulting Steven Woolfe

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37587814

 

Both.

 

Barred? He's exiled to the Colonies.

 

Not sure
Is this?

 

FREEDOM FOR TOOTING.

please log in to view this image

 

Not on that Stan: droves of people will be logging off and refusing to come back now.

 

'Life long Labour voter' Hookers just been on with Peter Levy discussing his 'mano il mano' yesterday,
Possible Coup Des Tar on the cards?

 

But then by that logic, we shouldn't have off topic threads either.