The "Mighty Juggernaut" thread

Because it's far too much fun to take the piss.

Shame HIAG couldn't stick to the agreement he made with @gooner4ever

A monumental welching that.

 

Thanks mate I saw it.

I won't ask you to reciprocate, because I know he can see my comments.

 

Cheers, Bro.

 

I can't see what Pixie is writing, but could someone please ask him for proof of where I agreed not to mention the silly ****er in any posts whilst he put himself on IGNORE in order to dodge his bottling of my long (and still) standing challenge?

 

HIAG has clearly taken part in these threads by virtue of mentioning me. A welching of monumental proportions.

As for any of his other accounts, I haven't even bothered to check yet, but I'm sure it would up the 'welch' count

 

I think it's time for a new thread where we vote on the forfeit for HIAG.

Maybe Luvgonzo could choose an avatar that HIAG has to carry for a month

 

Has Pixie yet shown that I agreed not to mention him whilst he had me on IGNORE (wink wink!)?

It would be an interesting exercise for someone of low intelligence (Bambi or Skiddy, perhaps) to carry out to discover what percentage of Pixie's posts mentioned me or alluded to me, whilst he had me on "ignore." My betting is that it will be close to 98%.

 

Done. I'm sure @gooner4ever will be able to highlight other areas that you've welched on too.

What you've failed to grasp is that whilst I chose to put you on ignore, I didn't agree not to mention or allude to you. Whereas you did with regard to me and subsequently welched it. The devil is in the detail you see.

What with you being a lawyer, I would have thought you would have checked the fine details

 

I can't see what Pixie's writing.

I take it that he's posted a link to a post where I agree to anything?

By the way, has he finally agreed to my open challenge? I'm hoping that his time on "ignore" made him reconsider his previous bottling stance.

 

The link is there and it's clear that you can see it along with my posts.

Would you like to apologise for welching on this latest challenge now ?

I can only take your silence as an admission of guilt.

 

I see a blank reply, so take it that Pixie has posted to my exact post in which I agree to anything?

Or is he merely going through his usual idiotic act of posting a link to what someone else has written and claiming that I agreed to it? Surely he wouldn't be that moronic?

 

http://www.not606.com/threads/propo...ining-every-thread.335682/page-3#post-9676449

You make this far too easy for me HIAG

 

I can see a blank reply.

I do hope that Pixie hasn't linked to my accepting a challenge that he bottled, and which therefore voided that challenge, and attempting to use that as "evidence" that I agreed not to mention him?

Surely, he wouldn't be so stupid as to attempt that?

Firstly, G4E put forward the proposal as a challenge to be accepted by both Pixie and me, but only I was man enough to accept. He bottled it, so the deal was never concluded.

Secondly, there is nothing in that challenge that prevented either of us from mentioning the other. It merely prevented either from mentioning the other on threads that had been started by the respective other, or by others about either of us. So, even if it is possible to unilaterally accept G4E's challenge (which it cannot, since it is predicated on both of us accepting the challenge - and Pixie bottled it big-time), there is nothing in the challenge to support Pixie's argument.

But, I would expect him to know all of this and not attempt to use it was evidence to support his silly argument. He'd have to be a complete muppet to do otherwise.

Perhaps one of you lads can pass this on to him, as I have him on IGNORE.

Cheers, lads.

 

...a lot of words there ... think it's a code .... think I've deciphered it ... it really reads :

HIAG is an honourless fool ... with a disturbing obsession for weird films ...


Wow ...damning ...

 

#rattled

G4E's challenge wasn't a bet that needed both parties to agree to to activate it (like the one you welched on that Luv set) It was simply an invitation for us both which you 'ACCEPTED' and subsequently welched on.

Being a hot shot Lawyer, I thought you would have checked the finer details.

I said from the beginning I wouldn't agree to it because I knew you'd welch it and I was proved right.

I knew you'd walk into this particular wum **** up, I've simply laid the trap and waited for you to stumble blindly into it.

 

I can see a blank reply, again.

I take it that Pixie has recanted his silly "bottled G4E's challenge" nonsense and has realised that nothing in what G4E proposed prevented either of us from mentioning the other? I do hope so, because only a psychotic muppet would keep bleating on about it!

No doubt someone will pass that on to him as I have him on IGNORE.

Thanks, lads.

 

#rattled

G4E even pulled you up on it

Your continuing ranting won't brush your welching under the carpet mate.

Keep em coming

 

Has someone called the cops yet?

I think the segments want to file a complaint.

 

#rattled

#bottler

 

Arsenal and Tottenham both want to sign Real Madrid midfielder Isco, 24, who is out of contract in 2018. (Diario Madridista, via Daily Star)

It'll be interesting to see who he chooses.

Pixie will be praying it isn't us!