Off Topic Sensible party policy suggestions (sensible ones please)

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Of course, the noble socialist, generous to a fault until it's their wallet at work, then it's excuses after excuse.

If you want to be IN the EU, why not move to an EU country? I'm okay here, along with the democratic choice.
You're the one making excuses or are you actually volunteering to pay for the NHS yourself?

The suggestion of leaving the country was to show how dumb your previous argument was.
I wasn't saying that you should actually do it.

It's funny that you bemoan socialists failing to contribute, as I think you'll find that it's the capitalists doing that at the moment.
Facebook, Amazon and Starbucks have all paid the square root of **** all, yet that's ok, apparently.
Don't blame them or the people that absolutely tanked the economy though, it's down to some Polish builders and nurses. <ok>
 
So you mean you'll continue to pay your civil servant taxes to help contribute to international aid payments whilst whining about how international aid payments are contributing to keeping taxes above what you consider to be a fair level?

Or to put it another way, **** all.

My mam married an immigrant so technically she's already housed a bunch of us! <laugh>

Why would I only pay taxes to a civil servant? I haven't complained about the level of taxes, and I've argued we should contribute more to international aid. In short, I haven't really got a clue what you're babbling on about, and I don't believe you have either.

So your mam will be happy for coachloads more. Excellent. So what are YOU going to be contributing to this brave new world Stan?
 
You're the one making excuses or are you actually volunteering to pay for the NHS yourself?

The suggestion of leaving the country was to show how dumb your previous argument was.
I wasn't saying that you should actually do it.

It's funny that you bemoan socialists failing to contribute, as I think you'll find that it's the capitalists doing that at the moment.
Facebook, Amazon and Starbucks have all paid the square root of **** all, yet that's ok, apparently.
Don't blame them or the people that absolutely tanked the economy though, it's down to some Polish builders and nurses. <ok>

You perhaps missed the edit, but your NHS analogy is bollocks, because we already pay, even at the point of use.

Capitalists are a bunch of ****s too, as are people that think everything is polarised. I've never blamed the Poles either.

You ladies seem to get all giddy between each other, and try to dictate what others must surely think.

No wonder you're so confused.
 
And we don't pay for refugees via our taxes? <doh>

Don't we? Fascinating. It's bollocks and adds nothing to support your argument, but fascinating all the same. Life just isn't that black and white.

I'd rather pay more in foreign aid, possibly taken from some of the defence budget.
 
Why would I only pay taxes to a civil servant?
Pete would be proud of this pedantry, well done. It's great that you have a role model <laugh>

I haven't complained about the level of taxes, and I've argued we should contribute more to international aid. In short, I haven't really got a clue what you're babbling on about, and I don't believe you have either.
My apologies, you're happy to pay more to keep them out. Like joining a private members club with a list of unwelcome undesirables at the door.

So your mam will be happy for coachloads more. Excellent. So what are YOU going to be contributing to this brave new world Stan?
My mam lives in Spain, I don't know what their policies are over there and I don't get a vote. And it was your ludicrous either/or suggestion. Given you and Pete aren't yet in government I don't think I have to sign up to your brave new world just yet. You dopey tart! <laugh>
 
You perhaps missed the edit, but your NHS analogy is bollocks, because we already pay, even at the point of use.

Capitalists are a bunch of ****s too, as are people that think everything is polarised. I've never blamed the Poles either.

You ladies seem to get all giddy between each other, and try to dictate what others must surely think.

No wonder you're so confused.
But you can see how everyone's reacting. For example, everyone's currently laughing at me in this thread. David Icke said so.
 
Pete would be proud of this pedantry, well done. It's great that you have a role model <laugh>


My apologies, you're happy to pay more to keep them out. Like joining a private members club with a list of unwelcome undesirables at the door.


My mam lives in Spain, I don't know what their policies are over there and I don't get a vote. And it was your ludicrous either/or suggestion. Given you and Pete aren't yet in government I don't think I have to sign up to your brave new world just yet. You dopey tart! <laugh>

Bless you Stan. It's sweet reading your ramblings. I hope your mam left you with a carer. Social Services take a dim view of people like you being left home alone.
 
Don't we? Fascinating. It's bollocks and adds nothing to support your argument, but fascinating all the same. Life just isn't that black and white.

I'd rather pay more in foreign aid, possibly taken from some of the defence budget.
Apparently you don't understand the clear comparison, but I shouldn't be surprised.

Lowering our defence spending would be a bad idea for a number of reasons.
We're already dangerously close to the NATO minimum, for a start.
 
But you can see how everyone's reacting. For example, everyone's currently laughing at me in this thread. David Icke said so.

Did he really Stan? He was among the first to raise the spectre of Saville, so there's perhaps a reason he's joined the voices in your head. <ok>
 
Brilliant banter, you're definitely "winning" the discussion when you have to resort to stuff like that <laugh>
This is from the guy who was criticising people for insulting Pete in the other thread.
All the Remain voters had to resort to that sort of childish behaviour, while the leavers would never do such a thing.
 
Apparently you don't understand the clear comparison, but I shouldn't be surprised.

Lowering our defence spending would be a bad idea for a number of reasons.
We're already dangerously close to the NATO minimum, for a start.

There isn't a clear comparison, that's why I describe the analogy as bollocks. Perhaps I should have made it clearer.

In reality, we only meet the NATO target now because we fudged the figures.
 
This is from the guy who was criticising people for insulting Pete in the other thread.
All the Remain voters had to resort to that sort of childish behaviour, while the leavers would never do such a thing.
He's not the sharpest bigot in the box!<laugh>
 
Random!

But thanks for confirming you're a disciple of Icke. <laugh>

You do keep trying to make that one stick don't you Stan. Is it Ickes shapeshifters you think are silly? Me too. <ok>

You know billions believe in similar things from other philosophies don't you? I think they're silly too. Do you?