I strongly resent, Coppell, Pulis and detest Holloway to this very day, so I can't throw stones I echo that 100% Wiz!!
I wouldn't feel the need to boo him but then neither feel the need to welcome him back. Matt Hill always got a good reception but the one Matt Smith got when he came on for Fulham last season would take some beating-
Done in another thread but the only thing I remember vividly was that City had let a truly great player go too cheaply. No doubts about his class. Oozed it on the pitch. Andy Cole was very complimentary about City and the support he had from Shelton in his book. Then there is Mr Didn't want to play. Fans with lifetimes knowledge think City have had Villa over here big time. Time will tell but he is looked upon widely as a twat.
starting to sound like maynard mk2, just think we got shot of a player that really no longer wanted to play for us i.e useless, for a very good price and reckon we got the best of the deal - end off
No player is going to move to a new club without saying that their new employers are better at the end of the day. Whilst the refusal to play was poor it sometimes has to be done by players to force through a move.
Mind the gap! said: ↑ Whilst the refusal to play was poor it sometimes has to be done by players to force through a move. Rod comment Why does it have to be done? It doesn't, but it does sometimes work more than not as the club who have the player wont play a player who is not 100% mostly the agent is the evil of the plot . "days to go you have to do something, refuse to play .. that will p** them off!"
To get rid for 12-15 million is a brilliant result for Bristol City. However, worryingly, 2 points from 3 games since he left is a different bottle of crisps
I'm not sure that having Kodjia in the side for the last 3 games would have changed any of those results and individual mistakes though.
Its like when the pundits say " as last nite included" Wilbs could have had a hatrick ! that really makes me laugh when based on 3 opportunities, the first goes in so the event leading up to second directly follows on . a miss so still only 1 so it goes on to event 3 a miss so it goes on .. event 2 goes in .so everything after that is completely different to what then transpires ... event 3 as we saw/heard it never takes place .... not to say they might not get a hatrick but based on 1 goal and 2 misses doesn't meet the criteria .....
ABRAHAMS MIGHT GET A HATRICK THIS WEEKEND ....... STILL PLAYING Fulham Saturday and the start will be only minutes from the finish! ..lol
