So we aren't signing an attacking midfielder because Abel is staying, so does that mean we aren't signing another striker aswell? Or it's a money thing as we aren't getting the £20 million for Abel it's one player or another so we are sacrificing the Henricksen deal for a striker
He could have been the player we bought with the extra cash, having spent ten of it on the actual replacement... No extra cash now, so perhaps one is abandoned.
No we bloody shouldn't.... !!!...besides I think he's off to Norwich and if he;s not good enough for Boro, he certainly isn't good enough for us..
Just because a club "plays something down" doesn't mean it won't happen, folks. Plus, there has been pretty lazy journalism throughout - only time will tell.
Yes it's worrying, I know we've signed mason but from what I've read on here Henricksens the type of player we've needed for......well as long as I can remember
Peter...that's what the word "ongoing" in my post which you quote means. Are you posting just for the sake of posting. You seem to be quibbling with a lot of posters on here. Not like you.
He's still a midfielder though! I like the idea of his position in away games. We have seemingly favoured 2 up front so far this season. Limited by availability, but it has been very effective.
Absolutely spot on Geo. Henricksen ticked all the boxes. To me he was the ideal player to bring in and could become increasingly valuable in the years ahead. What are we thinking??? Just hope the YP has got the wrong end of the stick here and the Norwegian/Danish press are right. Would hate to see him playing against us.
