Pogba will generate 40m in marketing as profit a year, experts says in media .. how much Mane will generate? is stupid you look to how much we paid without looking to the bigger picture in terms of how much we will get back in all the levels..and if you want to discuss it money wise alone, at least add how much we will get back in profits and deduct it from the price .. that is common sense
If City thinks Stones is worth £47.5m, especially after last season which is now being blamed on Martinez's style, then we should be celebrating getting Pogba for only £90m.
Just remember my ami désespéré, we have been here before with Falcao and Di Maria. You lot do carried away far too easily
Pogba wanted by all big clubs and is a world class not sure how he fit in same category of rejected players like Falcao and Di Maria.. Pogba is a world class player ... a young beast who will only be better .. pogba can sell shirts and sponsorship .. those two you mentioned will not .. this is why UTD had to pay a premium ..
Why did no one else bid then? I tell you why because they saw the price and only one club daft enough to pay it
Who gives a flying fck who wanted him. I can name £200m spent by Liverpool on ****e in the last 2 transfer windows that NOBODY wanted. Not even them!
I never wanted Mane personally, but he's a decent signing tbf. I'm just saying that since the moment Klopp arrived, everyone has been excusing your piss poor performances on a squad that you've paid close to £200m on and that all the fans claimed were not good enough.
Of course. Just like Bale no one could match the £86m. Barcelona thought he was overpriced. Just like Madrid thought The rat was. That how it works. Zidane himself said they couldn't match the price paid by United as they didn;t have the money or the wages asked by Pogba. They would have bought him if they had the money.
How much of that has been paid for by sales of players Alot of signings when Rodgers was here were questioned
No. thats the whole point. Zidane said they didn't have it. They were already under investigation for illegal subsidy. They were desperate to get him.
Rodgers spent 350 million over 3 years on a squad that now, on the admission of most pool fans, is in need of a "massive rebuilding job" What do you all make of this ?
Do either of those things matter? All the big clubs are spending ridiculous sums, whether it's on one player or ten. The amounts going out are the same.
