Maybe £45 to you isn't a lot of money, it maybe to myself and others. £45 a year is a great saving for me.
Think you are a bit out on your figures there. My old man is fine with paying whatever, he can afford it, that i do know. He offered to pay for mine also if things are still tight, this i wouldn't entertain.
If i am right, next season my old man would be paying £324 for (£27x12 months) I seriously doubt with your £200 increase taken off that price, he is currently paying £124 a season. I will ask what he has paid this season, i am not 100% sure at this time.
In the South a senior pass was £286 this season, you said in E6 you'd still be better off by £45, I just pointed out that he's be £200 worse off as he'd be paying £486. You should stop digging.
I'm not digging fella, the E6 was mentioned as a far flung supposition. We will be in the South Stand for this coming season and i don't see why we would be expected to move out as we fall into the "family" group, this we have been told by the club so for me it is point raised and topic closed on the issue.
Morning ****, You didn't actually just say that did you? "Why should i pay more for my ticket, why should i pay more for "anything" so my neighbour with a tribe can go watch for a fraction of the price i have to pay? People with kids want to take them to see football, pay the going rate for them... My dad did for me until i could afford to pay my way." Makes you look a little selfish **** who tells porkie pies, a little PLW. Why didn't you go this season but you're back for the PL? You can stop the pretence that you had a ticket that a mate was using because that's bollocks.
Read back numbnut, you really are as thick as pigshit aren't you.I had work that i couldn't afford to turn down. My old mans friend took over the seat to keep it for when and if i could go back , now i can afford to go back due to the generous price reduction for me, i will. I have probably been watching City longer than you have slimed around the earth. Not that i should have to explain myself over again to a thick scumbag like you!
So are two cousins in their 30s but I don't think that is what the ruling means. the intention is for adults with children needing supervision and juniors that don't. require supervision. if you move you could take it up with the club.
We won't be moved, don't lose any sleep over it, we aren't. We have been told we are a family group. 2 cousins would probably fall into the same category also.
You're getting a little touchy ****, are you being found out? I bet you was the Torquay game wasn't you? So this was lie lie then? "I did not renew my pass this season after 30+ years due to the pricing and work committments, but the way i see it now and understand, i will be able to have a seat (maybe not my seat i gave up) in the south stand for approx £27 a month." Oh dear.
They've relaxed the rules for this first season, the original rule was that it had to be an adult (or adults) with an U18.
If you were a lawyer you'd be describing R7 as so ambiguous it's almost pointless. My perspective is to look at how words have legal meaning, wi the benefit of legal training and qualifications. Imagine a law saying you must have chocolate for old people: then think what counts as chocolate, and how old qualifies. R7 is about as equivocal as a politicians answer... It can be read in a hundred different ways. To think I don't understand what it says is stupid, to think what it says can be quantified is the issue! If it can't be defined completely it can't be enforced. That's why legislation has elaboration. If R7 has elaboration somewhere, or persuasive notes to expand on it, great. If not, it's not simple to apply it. Think about what concessions means, or may mean. Then think what available means, as the club are making an "option" available to any OAP (they can choose to accept something else).
The rules say we MUST offer concessions to kids and seniors, we are currently promoting that fact that we offer no concessions to these groups, that clearly puts us in breach of those rules.
