Damned if they do, damned if they don't springs to mind. Yet they're the unmovable, unwilling to move on ones.
if the Allams have sanctioned this then Im staggered. The flag showing HULL CITY AFC, the word City being the prominent word in the whole song and also of course the reference to history. Still, if they are not at the stadium to hear it they will be able to turn the sound down when watching at home on the tv.
I don't think it's really something people can sing along to. It's a great song but you won't get people joining in. Unless OLM knows something I don't, I think this is just based on a tweet to James Mooney suggesting it, to which he replied "let's do it" or something along those lines. On that basis it's unlikely the Allams would even know about it. Still, let's wait and see. I can't imagine a scenario where Allam snr does find out and sees the video but is absolutely fine with it being played at 'his' stadium. Maybe just playing the song would avoid that. Even then there's a few too many C-bombs for his liking.
Nobody said they got involved with the music. Why have you made out like they have? Indeed I even specified that if this is played then they probably don't know about it. And what do you mean 'ffs'? If you were the owner of a business and somebody employed by you did something very publicly that went totally against everything you have publicly said about said business wouldnt you be a trifle miffed? Indeed lets make it more specific - when you owned Lambretta how would you have felt if someone employed to do your advertising went with the message that the mod movement was rubbish, The Who were **** and everyone should stop living such a retrospective life and get with the ****ing times?
Kinell this escalated quick. I am confused about something though. No Kemps, back the **** off, not that. On the one hand we're told the Allams control everything in and around the club, micro managers of the worst kind. Then, we're told they aren't. Make your ****ing minds up.
Well that's a shock. I couldve predicted this standard 'not got a leg to stand on' response. He was the one responding 'ffs' about something that nobody had said.
So that's the considered response rather than coming back to the point 'Nobody said they got involved with the music. Why have you made out like they have? Indeed I even specified that if this is played then they probably don't know about it.' You're the one who said 'ffs' about something that nobody said. if you hadn't said that then I wouldn't have responded would I? And oh we're name calling are we - erm, ok - you big piss kidney.
Why the **** should I? As I said, you're the one who started it with a post saying 'ffs' which if you hadnt made I'd have nothing to shut up about. You cant just post what the **** you like and when someone calls you out on it then name call and then tell them to shut up. Oh sorry, you can - its your ball or you'll take it home. I'll follow your lead next time, when you post a ridiculous comment criticising what nobody said I'll saw 'shut up you whiney tart' and then resort to playground namecalling.
