Just wondering where that chap got his information from re the 1949 temperature as I am sure you will have checked his data.
Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.
- Thread starter BBFs Unpopular View
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
Just wondering where that chap got his information from re the 1949 temperature as I am sure you will have checked his data.
This is NASA GISS, the fraud I keep talking about
What NASA do not tell you is that the S.Hemi (southern hemisphere) is fake, any idiot can confirm this, by checking the available data sets for the past 150 years for the southern hemisphere, there are almost 0. Thousands would be needed, yet NASA have made up a completely fraudulent temp record for the southern hemisphere.
Saying "it's NASA they would not do that" doesn't cut it, or [HASHTAG]#conspiracytheory[/HASHTAG]
I have given verifiable facts that can be confirmed, there are no records for the southern hemisphere for the last 150 years and no paleoclimate data either. (which is why they cannot scientifically disprove the Medieval warming period, they let the media do that and idiots, ignorant fools, agree)
So if they had no data, how have they put a southern hemisphere record in GISS? AND made it match the northern, it is known too well that the southern and northern hemispheres are almost separate climatic systems that interact, the southern cannot be derived from the northern record.
[HASHTAG]#fraud[/HASHTAG]
You must log in or register to see images
What NASA do not tell you is that the S.Hemi (southern hemisphere) is fake, any idiot can confirm this, by checking the available data sets for the past 150 years for the southern hemisphere, there are almost 0. Thousands would be needed, yet NASA have made up a completely fraudulent temp record for the southern hemisphere.
Saying "it's NASA they would not do that" doesn't cut it, or [HASHTAG]#conspiracytheory[/HASHTAG]
I have given verifiable facts that can be confirmed, there are no records for the southern hemisphere for the last 150 years and no paleoclimate data either. (which is why they cannot scientifically disprove the Medieval warming period, they let the media do that and idiots, ignorant fools, agree)
So if they had no data, how have they put a southern hemisphere record in GISS? AND made it match the northern, it is known too well that the southern and northern hemispheres are almost separate climatic systems that interact, the southern cannot be derived from the northern record.
[HASHTAG]#fraud[/HASHTAG]
To back up my previous, here are the climate masters discussing it in an email gained from the internal leak, as some proper scientist in the CRU had a conscience and leaked emails proving fraud. As also shown by Michael Mann, they conspired to delete data rather than hand it over to FOI requests, these guys were using your tax bucks, to fraud you.
Phill Jones to Tom Wigley at the CRU East Anglia
Yes NO temp record for the southern hemisphere, so Giss is a proven fraud. They just made it up.
But this clear fraud is not proof of fraud neither is "hiding the decline in temp with a nature trick" apparently, or actually being caught conspiring to conceal data. Making up temp records is also not fraud apparently. Apparently it's me, I am seeing things, I'm "crazy"
Satellites can cover the southern hemisphere so why land stations... there are **** all in the SH, it is a made up record, even current records, cos Sats do not show the warming that's why.
Maybe @Diego can explain why these pure scientists make up a completely fake temp record for the southern hemisphere, as he thinks science is this thing, all encompassing and pure, not a hodge podge of humans working for people with their own agendas from corporate to government
Phill Jones to Tom Wigley at the CRU East Anglia
You must log in or register to see images
Yes NO temp record for the southern hemisphere, so Giss is a proven fraud. They just made it up.
But this clear fraud is not proof of fraud neither is "hiding the decline in temp with a nature trick" apparently, or actually being caught conspiring to conceal data. Making up temp records is also not fraud apparently. Apparently it's me, I am seeing things, I'm "crazy"
Satellites can cover the southern hemisphere so why land stations... there are **** all in the SH, it is a made up record, even current records, cos Sats do not show the warming that's why.
Maybe @Diego can explain why these pure scientists make up a completely fake temp record for the southern hemisphere, as he thinks science is this thing, all encompassing and pure, not a hodge podge of humans working for people with their own agendas from corporate to government
Last edited:
To back up my previous, here are the climate masters discussing it in an email gained from the internal leak, as some proper scientist in the CRU had a conscience and leaked emails proving fraud. As also shown by Michael Mann, they conspired to delete data rather than hand it over to FOI requests, these guys were using your tax bucks, to fraud you.
Phill Jones to Tom Wigley at the CRU East Anglia
You must log in or register to see images
Yes NO temp record for the southern hemisphere, so Giss is a proven fraud. They just made it up.
But this clear fraud is not proof of fraud neither is "hiding the decline in temp with a nature trick" apparently, or actually being caught conspiring to conceal data. Making up temp records is also not fraud apparently. Apparently it's me, I am seeing things, I'm "crazy"
Satellites can cover the southern hemisphere so why land stations... there are **** all in the SH, it is a made up record, even current records, cos Sats do not show the warming that's why.
Maybe @Diego can explain why these pure scientists make up a completely fake temp record for the southern hemisphere, as he thinks science is this thing, all encompassing and pure, not a hodge podge of humans working for people with their own agendas from corporate to government
Explain this you daft ****
https://www.wmo.int/media/content/w...est-record-2011-2015-warmest-five-year-period
If 1998 was the hottesyt
What you my idiot friend, dont understand, this is your link, ******.
The WMO reports on the Status of the Global Climate are based on contributions from WMO`s 191 Members. The global temperature analysis is principally derived from three complementary datasets maintained by the Hadley Centre of the UK’s Met Office and the Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom (combined); the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Centres for Environmental Information; and the Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS) operated by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
yes WTO are citing the very data I claim is fraudulent and NOAA is currently being investigated for, also the CRU which I just showed in their own emails are making up temp records, and NASA who as proven above created half their record from nothing, yet Tobes did not read his own link because if he did, he's know it's actually bollocks as shown by my last two posts prior, they make up half the global temp from thin air for the last 150 years
Terrific did not read it either yet commented on it's validity. Astounding religious ignorance
Tobes ignores the conspiring by scientists, cos he has no answer
What you my idiot friend, dont understand, this is your link, ******.
The WMO reports on the Status of the Global Climate are based on contributions from WMO`s 191 Members. The global temperature analysis is principally derived from three complementary datasets maintained by the Hadley Centre of the UK’s Met Office and the Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom (combined); the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Centres for Environmental Information; and the Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS) operated by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
yes WTO are citing the very data I claim is fraudulent and NOAA is currently being investigated for, also the CRU which I just showed in their own emails are making up temp records, and NASA who as proven above created half their record from nothing, yet Tobes did not read his own link because if he did, he's know it's actually bollocks as shown by my last two posts prior, they make up half the global temp from thin air for the last 150 years
Terrific did not read it either yet commented on it's validity. Astounding religious ignorance
Tobes ignores the conspiring by scientists, cos he has no answer
Last edited:
Tobes doesn't know ****, cant even read his own links, 3 minute expert and his girlfriend Terrific, owned again
WTO also does not represent global meteorology, not by a long shot as many call the IPCC liars, including the leading French meteorologist sacked right before the Paris climate conference, for "denial"
WTO also does not represent global meteorology, not by a long shot as many call the IPCC liars, including the leading French meteorologist sacked right before the Paris climate conference, for "denial"
Last edited:
We know what would happen anyone at any pro warmist organisation who disagreed, removed asap, funding pulled, attacked by green nutcases. That is how you get consensus.
The only real 97% consensus is the number of scientists keeping their mouths shut to save their funding and their careers
The only real 97% consensus is the number of scientists keeping their mouths shut to save their funding and their careers
So every piece of data quoted or referred to is a [HASHTAG]#fraud[/HASHTAG] then?
All of the temperature analysis?
You're such a dumb ****ing ****, it's truly incredible the ****e you'll swallow.Tobes doesn't know ****, cant even read his own links, 3 minute expert and his girlfriend Terrific, owned again
WTO also does not represent global meteorology, not by a long shot as many call the IPCC liars, including the leading French meteorologist sacked right before the Paris climate conference, for "denial"
That's all you got, the WTO used GISS, and CRU, both made up the temp record for half the planet mate, I just proved it, Phill Jones said it clear as day like wtf do you want ffs,
Stop being a dick and admit there is some fraud going on, not how much fraud but that there is at least some, which then means we have to relook at EVERYTHING
They (WTO) did not use satellite balloon or rural data, why? Cos it doesn't show warming, ffs like
I can prove there is no outer space by only showing you data for the oceans if you like. That is what you do when you leave out most of the data you have ffs.
Now you just sound like a slimey lawyer who has their client bang to rights murdering someone on live TV but scream for a mistrial because one of the pieces of evidence was labelled incorrectly
I posted an entire study a while back where they DID go back and relook at EVERYTHING
And they still found the warming
Denying that man made climate change is happening in the C21st equivalent of the flat earthers.
As per your [HASHTAG]#standard[/HASHTAG] conspiraloon MO you focus on one piece of the jigsaw to try and make out that based on that one piece the entire premise is a complete fraud. Whilst staring at that piece you conveniently ignore the other 99 that don't suit the conclusion that you've decided is empirical fact.
You did exactly the same with the 9/11 nonsense you spouted, and again with the Apollo missions. It's like conversing with a ****ing chimp.
Weather boy is back with more cack.
Hurricane = CAGW confirmed.
Warm december, the world is gonna end, witchcraft. You read like Bette Midler
do you even science?
Hurricane = CAGW confirmed.
Warm december, the world is gonna end, witchcraft. You read like Bette Midler
You must log in or register to see images
#do you even science?
Last edited:
Thankyou for your religious nonsense.
I posted nothing but facts, proven fraud, and data tampering as well as proven there is no ocean warming beyond .03 a decade. 3 data sets out of 4 say no warming. You say flat earth to all that data, destroyed rising oceans sinking islands crap too, as well as shown ocean levels from all over the world, not rising, some lowering..
I utterly monged your daffodils crap while showing El Nino is weakening in intensity along with the warming.
You have no clue about the science and you make statements like the above, and say flath earth, you believing it because "they said it" is very flat earthish man.
Basically politicians and media, that is who you are listening to, hence you are hopeless.
Do you even science?
[HASHTAG]#hopeless[/HASHTAG]
Daffodil crap?Thankyou for your religious nonsense.
I posted nothing but facts, proven fraud, and data tampering as well as proven there is no ocean warming beyond .03 a decade. 3 data sets out of 4 say no warming. You say flat earth to all that data, destroyed rising oceans sinking islands crap too, as well as shown ocean levels from all over the world, not rising, some lowering..
I utterly monged your daffodils crap while showing El Nino is weakening in intensity along with the warming.
You have no clue about the science and you make statements like the above, and say flath earth, you believing it because "they said it" is very flat earthish man.
Basically politicians and media, that is who you are listening to, hence you are hopeless.
Do you even science?
[HASHTAG]#hopeless[/HASHTAG]
You complete ****ing crank
https://www.wmo.int/media/content/w...est-record-2011-2015-warmest-five-year-period
Tobes, you are a knowledgeable fellow on other stuff, but on this matter, you are rat level educated.
To even think you know enough to form an opinion is ludicrous, your sidekicks too. Pick and choose your little points, see them get mullered and disappear and come back with some other piece of ****e, use labels and basically embarrass yourselves. 3 minute expert.
You think otherwise which just shows how ****ing stupid ye are,
This is why I dont read the ****e you post, cos it's all about me, cos you dont have child level understanding of this subject
To even think you know enough to form an opinion is ludicrous, your sidekicks too. Pick and choose your little points, see them get mullered and disappear and come back with some other piece of ****e, use labels and basically embarrass yourselves. 3 minute expert.
You think otherwise which just shows how ****ing stupid ye are,
This is why I dont read the ****e you post, cos it's all about me, cos you dont have child level understanding of this subject
You always try boil it down to a personal level when you have nowhere to run, or you run off and have a personal meltdown, they recover and come back for more.
On this thread, I just pity you mate
On this thread, I just pity you mate
- Status