forgive me if I'm mistaken, but doesn't that show that even by going back 20 years you can't find a table that shows us spending more than you?
well hmmm you did spend more than us, just you sold more than us, and saying as your were in the PL for a good 16 years or so and challenging, you had good players to sell.
All the same, they're swarthy, they have moustaches and take a **** load of cocaine. Brucey's going to be the next Pablo Escobar.
Err inflation? For the toon..... A cheese and onion gregg's pastie 2 years ago cost 40p. Today costs 55p. Inflation. Getting it? OR should i narrow it down from Gregg's pasties? Don't panic! It's only pretend. x
All that table proves is that if you want to win the league you have to spend spend spend. Now we are starting to do that we might start to close the gap on the top 6 but it will take 10 more years to catcht hem
I have been getting ripped off then, its 85p now for a cheese and onion pastie from Greggs, and the other ones they have are over £1, I only get the mexican chicken sarnies though, but they are £2.05 now.
I've been looking at ours and Newcastles dealings and what's apparent is Newcastle have been a lot better at recouping transfer fees than Sunderland have. You've still spent a shiz load more than us £103m according to that.
Sunderland: Transfers "£146million in 5 years" Sundries: £12,000pw Wages: £395,000pw Top striker £13,000,000 Being the North East number 1 team: priceless
According to that chart Newcastle received £35m from West Ham for Kevin Nolan. Don't know if that typo has gone onto the overall figure?
These figures can only be guess work because many of the transfer fees as we all know are undisclosed.
so the last couple of seasons we have under-acheived, and you have over-acheived? So if it all sorts it self out, then we will finish top 6 this season, and you lot will be relegated? I'll take that