Rodgers Sacked

Liverpool !!

 

You wouldn't accept Mourinho but I'm sure you loved Suarez who was found guilty of racial abuse and biting...

 

As mentioned above, we all love Suarez and would take him back in a heartbeat. Do or did morales and ethics come into question when we had him or if had the chance to have him back. I highly doubt it.

 

Witty attempt of responding to my argument without actually responding ...

 

lol anyone ever been watching joe.co.uk videos. They are well ****ing funny. Check this one out

 

Oi! I mentioned this yesterday, no ****er responded!

 

Double FFS at you and @Gerrez

are you both learning spanish or wha ?!

 

Lol - it's a valid point.

 

I think frank's argument, at least in part, is that Jose is not all he's cracked up to be. Suarez undoubtedly was.

 

Being found guilty of something by the FA doesn't mean much. Especially in this week that they found the video evidence of Mourinho screaming sexist abuse at his doctor (and followed up in post-match with slanderous comments) proved he was innocent, and the use of the feminine form of the swear words was in no way connected to the only female on the pitch being directly in his line of sight.

Mourinho attempted to gouge the eyes of an opponent coach.

There, that's the two Suarez incidents MORE than cancelled out. So how do you now make up for all the other ****y **** Mourinho does?

 

Rodgers evil days postponed.

 

Rodgers is a goner soon ...

 

Hmm, I'll believe it when/if it happens.

 

Not sure why anyone thinks Rodgers will be gone soon. If you look at the other teams whose managers' positions have been questioned, they are falling short of expectations, whereas Rodgers isn't:

McLaren: would have been expected to finish near the top of the bottom half of the table
Sherwood: survival, preferably 15th or above
Mourinho: title challenge

None of these managers are on track to achieve expectations, whereas FSG / any neutral observer would expect Liverpool to finish in the top half of the table. They are currently 10th - bang on track.

 

Again, people keep saying that we need a DoF to help sort things out. DoF's are just like managers, ****, average or great. What makes anyone think one we employ would be any good? Only difference is that they'd be in the job and have less pressure on them than the manager would do.

Who would people get as a DoF who's a realistic target, would draw top talent and ensure we're playing attacking football?

 

If Rodgers is right - and no-one at #LFC gave him top four target - it surely amounts to corporate negligence?http://t.co/8YR09vx8uE

Andy Kelly, Echo

Lol.....

 

A DoF is the one who will outline the strategy and philosophy for the club - they will be the ones who bring him players in line with how we want to play. It's to avoid us spending £32m on a big target man striker who is at odds with how we play for example. They will also ensure that we bring in a manager who is also in line.

As we all know, players and managers come and go frequently - a DoF is a long term appointment to ensure continuity and consistency with all comings and goings at the club so there is little disruption.

Who could we go for - Zorc at Dortmund would be ideal if Klopp comes in as coach, or Monchi at Sevilla. Both men are used to operating with a budget and developing extensive and large scouting networks, but also have the contacts in the game.

Players, managers and coaches are just a part of the structure - DoF is the top of that structure.